Cited by 2Computational Drug Discovery MethodsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFractal and DNA sequence analysis

QSAR and Complex Network Recognition of miRNAs in Stem Cells

Molina, Enrique, Uriarte, Eugenio, Santana, Lourdes, Matos, Maria, Borges, Fernanda·2013·Current Bioinformatics

Abstract

Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models have application in bioorganic chemistry mainly to the study of small sized molecules while applications to biopolymers remain not very developed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which are non-coding small RNAs, regulate a variety of biological processes and constitute good candidates to scale up the application of QSAR and complex network (CN). In this work, we selected microRNAs and predicted activity profile subsequently represented as a large network, which may be used to identify stem cell microRNAs with similar action. The propensity of a small RNA sequence to act as miRNA depends on its secondary structure, which one can explain in terms of folding thermodynamic and topological parameters; these can be used for fast identification of miRNAs at early stages of development of stem cells, and gain clarity inside cellular differentiation processes and diseases such as cancer. First, we calculated thermodynamic parameters and topological descriptors for 432 small RNA sequences. The model correctly recognized 203 of smiRNAs (94.0 %) and 216 of non-smiRNAs (100.0 %) divided into both training and validation series used to extend model validation for network construction. ROC curve analysis (area = 0.99) demonstrated that the present model significantly differentiates from a random classifier. In addition, a double ordinate cartesian plot of cross-validated residuals, standard residuals and leverages defined the domain of applicability of the model as a squared area within ±2 band for residuals and a leverage threshold of h = 0.0466. Last, we accounted for the methodology to combine QSAR and CN to carry out a study that would allow us to differentiate the activity of smiRNAs. The network predicted has 216 nodes (smiRNAs), 1948 edges (pairs of smiRNAs with similar activity), and low coverage density d = 8.4%. Comparative studies with real networks reveal that our network apparently has not only an ideal behavior but also resembles the known network models in different aspects. The combination of QSAR and CN is used for quickly accurate selection of new smiRNAs with potential use in bioorganic and medicinal chemistry. Keywords: Cancer, complex network, miRNA prediction, OD, 1D and 2D descriptors, QSAR, RNA structure, spectral moments, stem cells, thermodynamic parameters, topological descriptor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1574893611308040006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molina, E., Uriarte, E., Santana, L., Matos, M., & Borges, F.
Affiliations
University of Camagüey (CU)
Corresponding author
Borges, Fernanda
Venue
Current Bioinformatics
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
438-451
ISSN
1574-8936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320671906
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
microRNA prediction, stem cells, thermodynamic parameters, topological indices, complex networks, QSAR, RNA folding, cell differentiation, cancer, spectral moments, domain of applicability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review