Cited by 37Digital Holography and MicroscopyCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

Discriminating ramos and jurkat cells with image textures from diffraction imaging flow cytometry based on a support vector machine

Zhang, Ning, Sa, Yu, Guo, Yu, Lin, Wang, Wang, Ping, Feng, Yuanming·2018·Current Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: The flow cytometry (FCM) has been widely used in both basic and clinical research applications. However, the conventional noncoherent fluorescence and the bright or dark field images acquired spatially integrated and can only yield limited information. Few 3D morphological features of cells can be unveiled. Objective: Diffraction imaging techniques can be used to improve the flow cytometry system and to reflect some 3D morphological features of cells. Method: The newly developed diffraction imaging flow cytometry system (DIFC) in our previous studies could be used to compensate conventional flow cytometries to reflect a cell's 3D morphological features. In this study, we developed a method based on a Support Vector Machine to classify the diffraction images acquired from human acute leukaemia T (Jurkat) cells and Burkitt lymphoma B (Ramos) cells with the diffraction imaging flow cytometry system technique. Results: As a result, an accuracy of 99.38% with MCC value of 0.9875 was achieved in an independent testing dataset, which indicated that the DIFC system could differentiate the cells. Conclusion: It is indicated by the results that strong correlation exists between the characteristic parameters of the images and the 3D morphological features of cells. Since diffraction images correlate strongly to the 3D morphology of cells, this system could be used for studies concerning cellular morphology. Keywords: Flow cytometry, diffraction imaging, Jurkat, Ramos, support vector machine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1574893611666160608102537

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, N., Sa, Y., Guo, Y., Lin, W., Wang, P., & Feng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin Key Lab of BME Measurement, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Ping
  • Feng, Yuanming
Venue
Current Bioinformatics
Published
2018-02-19
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
50-56
ISSN
1574-8936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2438439291
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tianjin University
  • Tianjin Medical University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Digital Holography and Microscopy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
cell classification, Jurkat cells, Ramos cells, support vector machine, image texture features, 3D cell morphology, acute T-cell leukemia, Burkitt lymphoma, cell type discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review