Cited by 29Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGut microbiota and healthBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

A Novel Approach Based on Bipartite Network to Predict Human Microbe-Disease Associations

Wang, Lei, Ping, Pengyao, Kuang, Linai, Ye, Songtao, Buland lqbal, Faisal Muhammad, Pei, Tingrui·2018·Current Bioinformatics

Abstract

Background: Accumulating studies have indicated that the human microbiome plays critical roles in human health and disease. It is significantly important to analyze the relationships between microbe and disease, which is helpful for the understanding of disease mechanism, diagnosis and therapy. Predicting potential microbe-disease associations would not only boost understanding of the disease mechanism but also it will help to find biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. However, systems understanding of microbe-disease relationships is mostly undefined. Objective: It is important to analyze the relationships between microbe and disease, for this, we proposed a new method to predict potential microbe-disease associations. Method: In this article, we constructed a gene-disease bipartite network and a microbe-disease bipartite network based on known human gene-disease associations and microbe-disease interactions, respectively. Then, a model for predicting potential microbe-disease associations was designed based on the two bipartite networks. In order to evaluate the prediction performance of our proposed method, Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV) and K-fold Cross Validation procedures were implemented. Results: Simulation results show that our method can achieve a reliable performance with AUC of 0.8993 based on microbe-disease associations downloaded from HMDAD database and human genedisease relationships downloaded from DisGeNET database. Furthermore, it also can reach to a sound performance with AUC of 0.8640 only based on the known microbe-disease associations in the framework of LOOCV, which is clearly better than the performance of state of the art KATZHMDA model with AUC of 0.8382. Conclusion: It is anticipated that our proposed model could be used to predict more potential microbedisease associations, which is helpful for the understanding of disease mechanism, diagnosis and prognosis. Keywords: Bipartite network, similarity, computing model, prediction, microbe-disease associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1574893612666170911143601

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several researches proved that coding genes, noncoding RNAs, and proteins are related to diseases, including AD.

    “Several researches proved that coding genes/noncoding RNAs/proteins were related to diseases, including AD [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Ping, P., Kuang, L., Ye, S., Buland lqbal, F. M., & Pei, T.
Affiliations
  • Xiangtan University (CN)
  • College of Information Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China
Corresponding author
Wang, Lei
Venue
Current Bioinformatics
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
141-148
ISSN
1574-8936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756148272
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
human microbiome, bipartite graphs, gene-disease association, network similarity, DisGeNET, disease biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review