The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks
Open accessAbstract
Many analyses of ecological networks in recent years have introduced new indices to describe network properties.As a consequence, tens of indices are available to address similar questions, differing in specific detail, sensitivity in detecting the property in question, and robustness with respect to network size and sampling intensity.Furthermore, some indices merely reflect the number of species participating in a network, but not their interrelationship, requiring a null model approach.Here we introduce a new, free software calculating a large spectrum of network indices, visualizing bipartite networks and generating null models.We use this tool to explore the sensitivity of 26 network indices to network dimensions, sampling intensity and singleton observations.Based on observed data, we investigate the interrelationship of these indices, and show that they are highly correlated, and heavily influenced by network dimensions and connectance.Finally, we re-evaluate five common hypotheses about network properties, comparing 19 pollination networks with three differently complex null models: 1.The number of links per species ("degree") follow (truncated) power law distributions.2. Generalist pollinators interact with specialist plants, and vice versa (dependence asymmetry).3. Ecological networks are nested.4. Pollinators display complementarity, owing to specialization within the network.5. Plant-pollinator networks are more robust to extinction than random networks.Our results indicate that while some hypotheses hold up against our null models, others are to a large extent understandable on the basis of network size, rather than ecological interrelationships.In particular, null model pattern of dependence asymmetry and robustness to extinction are opposite to what current network paradigms suggest.Our analysis, and the tools we provide, enables ecologists to readily contrast their findings with null model expectations for many different questions, thus separating statistical inevitability from ecological process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Dowling, J. E., & Wald, G. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1981.tb06752.x · Cited by 17,893
Parry, G. D. R., Johnson, M. S., Bell, R. M., Edwards, R. W., & Wathern, P. (1984) · Planning and Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3045-3_3 · Cited by 7,591
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
Vegan : community ecology package. R package version 1.17-9
Oksanen, J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,549
Analysis of Ecological Communities
McCune, B., & Grace, J. B. (2002) · Cited by 5,986
Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems
May, R. M. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691206912 · Cited by 5,183
Analysis of Ecological Communities
Anderson, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00091-1 · Cited by 5,086
Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance
Krebs, C. J. (1973) · Cited by 4,620
Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology
Jongman, R. H. G., Braak, C. J. F. T., & Tongeren, O. F. R. V. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511525575 · Cited by 4,548
Cited by
The multilayer nature of ecological networks
Pilosof, S., Porter, M. A., Pascual, M., & Kéfi, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0101 · Cited by 574
A comparative study of ecological specialization estimators
Poisot, T., Canard, E., Mouquet, N., & Hochberg, M. E. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00174.x · Cited by 156
Sebastián‐González, E., Morales‐Reyes, Z., Botella, F., Naves‐Alegre, L., Pérez‐García, J. M., Mateo‐Tomás, P., Olea, P. P., Moleón, M., Barbosa, J. M., Hiraldo, F., et al. (2020) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05083 · Cited by 63
DIVERSIFY: Ecology-inspired software evolution for diversity emergence
Baudry, B., Monperrus, M., Mony, C., Chauvel, F., Fleurey, F., & Clarke, S. (2014) · 2014 Software Evolution Week - IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering, and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE) · doi:10.1109/csmr-wcre.2014.6747203 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B.
- Venue
- The Open Ecology Journal
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-24
- ISSN
- 1874-2130 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156239678
- Cited by
- 1,772
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 27.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1874213000902010007
- The paper
- Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B. (2009). Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks. The Open Ecology Journal. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.