Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,772

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks

Open access
Dormann, Carsten F., Frund, Jochen, Bluthgen, Nico, Gruber, Bernd·2009·The Open Ecology Journal

Abstract

Many analyses of ecological networks in recent years have introduced new indices to describe network properties.As a consequence, tens of indices are available to address similar questions, differing in specific detail, sensitivity in detecting the property in question, and robustness with respect to network size and sampling intensity.Furthermore, some indices merely reflect the number of species participating in a network, but not their interrelationship, requiring a null model approach.Here we introduce a new, free software calculating a large spectrum of network indices, visualizing bipartite networks and generating null models.We use this tool to explore the sensitivity of 26 network indices to network dimensions, sampling intensity and singleton observations.Based on observed data, we investigate the interrelationship of these indices, and show that they are highly correlated, and heavily influenced by network dimensions and connectance.Finally, we re-evaluate five common hypotheses about network properties, comparing 19 pollination networks with three differently complex null models: 1.The number of links per species ("degree") follow (truncated) power law distributions.2. Generalist pollinators interact with specialist plants, and vice versa (dependence asymmetry).3. Ecological networks are nested.4. Pollinators display complementarity, owing to specialization within the network.5. Plant-pollinator networks are more robust to extinction than random networks.Our results indicate that while some hypotheses hold up against our null models, others are to a large extent understandable on the basis of network size, rather than ecological interrelationships.In particular, null model pattern of dependence asymmetry and robustness to extinction are opposite to what current network paradigms suggest.Our analysis, and the tools we provide, enables ecologists to readily contrast their findings with null model expectations for many different questions, thus separating statistical inevitability from ecological process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1874213000902010007

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 1,772

Metadata

Authors
Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B.
Venue
The Open Ecology Journal
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
1874-2130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156239678
Cited by
1,772
References
80
FWCI
27.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1874213000902010007
The paper
Dormann, C. F., Frund, J., Bluthgen, N., & Gruber, B. (2009). Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks. The Open Ecology Journal. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.