Cited by 7Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

Detection of the Electromagnetic Equivalents of the Emotional Characteristics of Words: Implications for the Electronic-Listening Generation

Open access
Saroka, Kevin S.·2011·The Open Behavioral Science Journal

Abstract

The audible energies associated with intense meaningful words significantly affect our experience and responses.Personal listening devices (such as music players) emit weak-intensity magnetic fields, that are shadowed by the sonic patterns, which have been associated with the induction of affective experiences experimentally within the laboratory.In the present study only the electromagnetic (EM) equivalents (1 to 5 microTesla) of emotional words as well as intensity-matched 60 Hz sine wave fields were presented across the temporal lobes.The EM equivalents were produced by converting a digital audio signal into an electromagnetic field.We found that subjects selected significantly more words with the same pleasantness as the target word presented as an EM equivalent.We also found an enhancement of the effect for the presentation of unpleasant-active words.These results suggest that the electromagnetic component of the spoken word from electronics may mediate emotional information that affects decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1874230001105010024

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Frey AH. Human auditory response to modulated electromagnetic energy. J App Physiol 1962; 17: 689-92.
  2. Akasofu SI. Auroa Borelais: The amazing northern lights. Alaska Geographic 1979; 6: 1-95.
  3. Whissell CM, Povey G, Dewson M. Remembering "Mr. Smith:" memory for emotional connotations of personality describing words. J Soc Beh Person 1987; 2: 535-42.
  4. Krippner S, Persinger M. Evidence for enhanced congruence between dreams and distant target material during periods of decreased geomagnetic activity. J Sci Exp 1996; 10: 487-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saroka, K. S.
Affiliations
Laurentian University (CA)
Corresponding author
Saroka, Kevin S.
Venue
The Open Behavioral Science Journal
Published
2011-05-30
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
24-27
ISSN
1874-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089349109
Cited by
7
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Open Behavioral Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
emotional words, electromagnetic fields, word valence, temporal lobe, personal listening devices, emotional processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review