Cited by 355Second Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMultilingual Education and Policy

Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Courses~!2008-03-28~!2008-05-27~!2008-06-11~!

Open access
Lasagabaster, David·2008·The Open Applied Linguistics Journal

Abstract

European educational systems are making great efforts to improve students' command of foreign languages, as there are many students who leave compulsory education with only the most limited ability to communicate in a foreign language.In this context the implementation of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) courses is becoming commonplace throughout Europe, because this approach is believed to significantly improve overall language competence in the target language.This paper examines the implementation of CLIL in the Basque Country (Spain), a bilingual community in which both Basque and Spanish are official languages and where English represents the third language included in the curriculum.The results show that the CLIL approach is successful and helps to improve students' foreign language competence even in bilingual contexts where English has little social presence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1874913500801010030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Coyle D. Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. Int J Biling Edu Bilingual 2007; 10: 543-562.
  2. Coyle D. Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. Int J Bilingual Education Bilingualism 2007; 10: 543-562.
  3. Muñoz C. Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. Int Rev Appl Linguist (in press).
  4. Turnbull M, Lapkin S, Hart D, Swain M. Time on task and immer- sion graduates' French proficiency. In: Lapkin S. Ed. French sec- ond language education in Canada: empirical studies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1998; pp. 31-55.
  5. Dekeyser RM. The robustness of the critical period effect in second language acquisition. Stud Second Lang Acquis 2000; 22: 499-534.
  6. Navés T. The long-term effects of an early start on writing in for- eign language learning. Ph.D.[Dissertation]. Barcelona: University of Barcelona, 2006.
  7. Egiguren I. Atzerriko hizkuntza goiztiarraren eragina gaitasun eleaniztunean. Ph.D.[Dissertation]. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Univer- sity of the Basque Country 2006.
  8. Muñoz C. The effects of age on foreign language learning: the BAF project. In: Muñoz C, Ed. Age and the rate of foreign language learning, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters 2006a; pp. 1-40.
  9. Coyle D. CLIL-A pedagogical approach from the European per- spective. In: Van Deusen-Sholl N, Hornberger NH, Eds. Encyclo- pedia language and education. Second and foreign language educa- tion, 2 nd edition, Volume 4, New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008; pp. 97-111.
  10. Marsh D. Language awareness and CLIL. In: Cenoz J,. and Horn- berger NH, Eds. Encyclopedia of language and education. Knowl- edge about language, 2 nd edition, Volume 6, New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008; pp. 233-246.
  11. Merisuo-Storm T. Pupils' attitudes towards foreign-language learn- ing and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching Teacher Edu 2007; 23: 226-235.
  12. Kobayashi Y. The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students' attitudes towards learning Eng- lish. Gender Edu 2002; 14: 181-197.
  13. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Bailey P, Daley CE. Cognitive, affective, per- sonality, and demographic predictors of foreign language achieve- ment. J Edu Res 2001; 94: 3-15.
  14. Oxford RL. Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Appl Lang Learn 1993; 4: 65-94.
  15. Pavlenko A, Piller, I. Language education and gender. In: May S, Hornberger NH. Eds. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2 nd edition, volume 1, Language policy and political issues in educa- tion, New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008; pp. 57-69.
  16. Schmidt R, Boraie D, Kassagby, O. Foreign language motivation: international structure and external connections. In: Oxford RL, Ed. Language learning motivation: pathways to the new century Ha- waii: University of Hawaii 1996; pp. 9-20.
  17. Airey J. Can you teach it in English? Aspects of the language choice debate in Swedish higher education. In: Wilkinson R, Ed. Integrating content and language. Meeting the challenge of a multi- lingual higher education, Maastricht: Maastricht University 2004; pp. 97-108.
  18. Airey J. Can you teach it in English? Aspects of the language choice debate in Swedish higher education. In: Wilkinson R, Ed. Integrating content and language. Meeting the challenge of a multi- lingual higher education, Maastricht: Maastricht University 2004; pp. 97-108.
  19. Hellekjaer G. Unprepared for English-medium instruction: a criti- cal look at beginner students. In: Wilkinson R, Ed. Integrating con- tent and language. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education, Maastricht University 2004; pp. 147-171.
  20. Marsh D. Language awareness and CLIL. In: Cenoz J,. and Horn- berger NH, Eds. Encyclopedia of language and education. Knowl- edge about language, 2 nd edition, Volume 6, New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008; pp. 233-246.
  21. Escobar C, Pérez-Vidal C. Teacher education for the implementa- tion of a content and language integrated approach (CLIL) in the school system. In: Wilkinson R, Ed. Integrating content and lan- guage. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education, Maastricht University 2004; pp. 402-415.
  22. Baker C. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. 2 nd edition. Clevedon: Multiling Matters 1996.
  23. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Halsey AH, Lauder H, Brown P, Wells AS, Eds. Education: culture, economy, and society, Ox- ford: Oxford University Press 1997; pp. 40-58.
  24. Dewaele JM. Predicting language learners' grades in the L1, L2, L3 and L4: the effect of some psychological and sociocognitive variables. Int J Multilingual 2007; 4: 169-197.
  25. Hyrkstedt I, Kalaja P. Attitudes toward English and its functions in Finland: a discourse-analytic study. World Engl 1998; 17: 345-357.
  26. van Essen A. English in mainland Europe -a Dutch perspective. World Engl 1997; 16: 95-103.
  27. Berg EC, Hult FM, King, KA. Shaping the climate for language shift? English in Sweden's elite domains. World Engl 2001; 20: 305-319.
  28. Goethals M. English in Flanders (Belgium). World Engl 1997; 16: 105-114.
  29. Kurtán Z. Foreign-language-medium instruction in Hungarian higher education. In: Wilkinson R. Ed. Integrating content and lan- guage. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education, Maastricht: Maastricht University 2004; pp. 126-136.
  30. Sercu L. The introduction of English-medium instruction in univer- sities. A comparison of Flemish lecturers' and students' language skills, perceptions and attitudes. In: Wilkinson R. Ed. Integrating content and language. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual higher education, Maastricht: Maastricht University 2004; pp. 547- 555.
  31. Mayer M. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press 1969.
  32. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES project: tools for analysing talk, Third edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2000.
  33. Cenoz J, Valencia JF. Additive trilingualism: evidence from the Basque Country. Appl Psycholinguist 1994; 15: 195-207.
  34. Lasagabaster D. The effect of knowledge about the L1 on foreign language skills and grammar. Int J Biling Edu Bilingual 2001; 4: 310-331.
  35. Dewaele JM. Predicting language learners' grades in the L1, L2, L3 and L4: the effect of some psychological and sociocognitive variables. Int J Multilingual 2007; 4: 169-197.
  36. Baker C. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. 2 nd edition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters 1996.
  37. Collins L, Halter RH, Lightbown PM, Spada, N. Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly 1999; 33: 655-680.
  38. Lynch BK. Language program evaluation: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
  39. Collins L, Halter RH, Lightbown PM, Spada, N. Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly 1999; 33: 655-680.
  40. Collins L, Halter RH, Lightbown PM, Spada, N. Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly 1999; 33: 655-680.
  41. Heining-Boynton AL, Haitema T. A ten-year chronicle of student attitudes toward foreign language in the elementary school. Mod Lang J 2007; 91: 149-168.
  42. Rifkin B. A ceiling effect in traditional classroom foreign language instruction: data from Russian. Mod Lang J 2005; 89: 3-18.
  43. Egiguren I. Atzerriko hizkuntza goiztiarraren eragina gaitasun eleaniztunean. Ph.D.[Dissertation]. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Univer- sity of the Basque Country, 2006.
  44. Kobayashi Y. The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students' attitudes towards learning Eng- lish. Gender Edu 2002; 14: 181-197.
  45. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Bailey P, Daley CE. Cognitive, affective, per- sonality, and demographic predictors of foreign language achieve- ment. J Edu Res 2001; 94: 3-15.
  46. Oxford RL. Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Appl Lang Learn 1993; 4: 65-94.
  47. Merisuo-Storm T. Pupils' attitudes towards foreign-language learn- ing and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching Teacher Edu 2007; 23: 226-235.
  48. Marsh D. Language awareness and CLIL. In: Cenoz J,. and Horn- berger NH, Eds. Encyclopedia of language and education. Knowl- edge about language, 2 nd edition, Volume 6, New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2008; pp. 233-246.
  49. Coyle D. Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. Int J Bilingual Edu Bilingual 2007; 10: 543-562.
  50. Dewaele JM. Predicting language learners' grades in the L1, L2, L3 and L4: the effect of some psychological and sociocognitive variables. Int J Multilingual 2007; 4: 169-197.
  51. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Halsey AH, Lauder H, Brown P, Wells AS, Eds. Education: culture, economy, and society, Ox- ford: Oxford University Press 1997; pp. 40-58.
  52. Ellis R. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, Eng- land: Oxford University Press 1994.
  53. Knell E, Haiyan Q, Miao P, Yanping C, Siegel LS, Lin Z, Wei, Z. Early English immersion and literacy in Xi´an, China. Mod Lang J 2007; 91: 395-417.
  54. Nunan D. The impact of English as a global language on educa- tional policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quart 2003; 37: 589-613.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lasagabaster, D.
Affiliations
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Corresponding author
Lasagabaster, David
Venue
The Open Applied Linguistics Journal
Published
2008-06-13
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
30-41
ISSN
1874-9135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1550911001
Cited by
355
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
258.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Open Applied Linguistics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • The Open Applied Linguistics Journal
Funders
Eusko Jaurlaritza
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
CLIL, foreign language proficiency, English as a foreign language, bilingual education, Basque Country, English language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review