Cited by 136Natural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesMedicinal Plant ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Herbal medicines for diabetes management and its secondary complications

Kumar, Shubham·2021·Current Diabetes Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/18756417mtexfmtq1z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, S.
Corresponding author
Kumar, Shubham
Venue
Current Diabetes Reviews
Published
2021
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
437-456
ISSN
  • 1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-6417
OpenAlex
W4312440470
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 13
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
herbal medicine, diabetes management, diabetes complications, traditional medicine, antidiabetic plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review