Cited by 37Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Metals Removal from Stormwater by Commercial and Non‐Commercial Granular Activated Carbons

van Lienden, Christopher, Shan, Lin, Rao, Shweta, Ranieri, Ezio, Young, Thomas M.·2010·Water Environment Research

Abstract

Removing dissolved metals from urban storMwater may be required to protect aquatic species in particular watersheds. This research examined the adsorption of zinc and copper on 12 granular activated carbons, of which six were obtained commercially and six were produced by thermal activation of agricultural byproducts in the laboratory. Batch studies were used to obtain single solute distribution coefficients at pH 7. Copper distribution coefficients were higher than those for zinc on each of the 12 adsorbents. Granular activated carbon (GAC) produced from nutshells was less effective than that produced from rice materials (straw and hulls). The rice-derived GACs had the highest zinc distribution coefficients, and the commercial GACs typically exhibited higher copper distribution coefficients. Distribution coefficients for zinc and copper typically were higher for the materials tested in this study than in previous research, possibly because of the lower dissolved metal concentrations used, which were chosen to represent highway stormwater. Adsorption isotherms were obtained for zinc and copper adsorption on one commercial GAC and on activated rice hulls in buffered laboratory water and in highway stormwater. The constituents in stormwater caused a reduction in sorption of zinc and copper of up to 80%. The results suggest that 1 kg of activated rice hulls could treat up to 7 m3 of stormwater for zinc or 46 m3 of copper before exhaustion at the 90th percentile dissolved concent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2175/106143009x12487095236874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Lienden, C., Shan, L., Rao, S., Ranieri, E., & Young, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
Corresponding author
Young, Thomas M.
Venue
Water Environment Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
351-356
ISSN
  • 0043-1303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1061-4303
  • 1554-7531
OpenAlex
W208088133
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Environment Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
California Department of Transportation (43A0168)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
stormwater treatment, granular activated carbon, zinc adsorption, copper adsorption, metal removal, distribution coefficient, adsorption isotherms, rice husk, nut shells, dissolved metals
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Carbon, Cities, Copper, Metals, Rain, Water, Zinc, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review