Cited by 12Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Fluorescence-based Single-cell Analysis of Whole-mount-stained and Cleared Microtissues and Organoids for High Throughput Screening

Open access
Renner, Henrik, Otto, Mandy, Grabos, Martha, Schöler, Hans, Bruder, Jan·2021·BIO-PROTOCOL

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture, especially in the form of organ-like microtissues ("organoids"), has emerged as a novel tool potentially mimicking human tissue biology more closely than standard two-dimensional culture. Typically, tissue sectioning is the standard method for immunohistochemical analysis. However, it removes cells from their native niche and can result in the loss of 3D context during analyses. Automated workflows require parallel processing and analysis of hundreds to thousands of samples, and sectioning is mechanically complex, time-intensive, and thus less suited for automated workflows. Here, we present a simple protocol for combined whole-mount immunostaining, tissue-clearing, and optical analysis of large-scale (approx. 1 mm) 3D tissues with single-cell level resolution. While the protocol can be performed manually, it was specifically designed to be compatible with high-throughput applications and automated liquid handling systems. This approach is freely scalable and allows parallel automated processing of large sample numbers in standard labware. We have successfully applied the protocol to human mid- and forebrain organoids, but, in principle, the workflow is suitable for a variety of 3D tissue samples to facilitate the phenotypic discovery of cellular behaviors in 3D cell culture-based high-throughput screens. Graphic abstract: Automatable organoid clearing and high-content analysis workflow and timeline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21769/bioprotoc.4050

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specialized microscopy techniques and tissue processing (e.g., clearing) can overcome challenges in imaging 3D cultures, but they require additional specifications and QC.

    “Specialized microscopy techniques and tissue processing (e.g., clearing) can overcome these challenges, but they require additional specifications and QC (Nurnberg et al., 2020; Renner et al., 2021; Cheng et al., 2023; Yoshida et al., 2020; Kahn-Krell et al., 2022).”

    From Recommendations on fit-for-purpose criteria to establish quality management for microphysiological systems and for monitoring their reproducibility (2024) · cites this paper as Renner et al., 2021

    The Abstract (page not provided) says whole-mount staining and tissue clearing enable imaging of entire 3D aggregates without sectioning. Day 6 (page not provided) specifies imaging settings that must be adjusted to the analysis, but the passages do not establish a requirement for additional quality control. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Renner, H., Grabos, M., Becker, K. J., Kagermeier, T. E., Wu, J., Otto, M., Peischard, S., Zeuschner, D., TsyTsyura, Y., Disse, P., Klingauf, J., Leidel, S. A., Seebohm, G., Scholer, H. R. www.bio-protocol.org/e4050 Bio-protocol 11(12): e4050. DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4050
  2. Copyright Renner et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Please cite this article as: Renner, H. et al., (2021). Fluorescence-based Single-cell Analysis of Whole-mount-stained and Cleared Microtissues and Organoids for High Throughput Screening. Bio-protocol 11(12): e4050. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4050.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renner, H., Otto, M., Grabos, M., Schöler, H., & Bruder, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Bruder, Jan
Venue
BIO-PROTOCOL
Published
2021
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e4050-e4050
ISSN
2331-8325 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3174159582
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BIO-PROTOCOL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
  • European Commission (669168, HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
organoids, microtissues, whole-mount immunostaining, tissue clearing, fluorescence imaging, single-cell analysis, high-throughput screening, automated liquid handling, 3D cell culture, brain organoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review