Cited by 15Medical Education and AdmissionsDental Education, Practice, ResearchDiversity and Career in Medicine

Improving diversity of dental students through the Boston University Master’s of oral health sciences postbaccalaureate program

Davies, Theresa A., Kaye, Elizabeth, Stahlberger, Michele, Abbas, Majed, Sarkis, Catherine, Reed, Linda, Dunham, Larry, Schreiber, Barbara M. +2 more·2019·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine (GSDM), in collaboration with Boston University School of Medicine, introduced the Oral Health Sciences (OHS) pipeline program in 2005 to enhance the academic preparedness of students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups for dental school admission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the OHS program's success in preparing URM students for dental school, as measured by acceptance to dental school and performance in the first and second years. Data on 2005‐15 program enrollees were collected from admissions records, the registrar, and the Office of Institutional Research on students' race/ethnicity, undergraduate and OHS grade point average (GPA), and Dental Admission Test (DAT) scores. Acceptance to dental school and performance at GSDM for non‐URM OHS graduates, URM OHS graduates, and non‐OHS dental students were compared. A total of 55 URM students completed the OHS program during this period, with 49 successfully matriculating to a dental school in the U.S. and 33 attending GSDM. Average OHS GPA was higher for those URM students accepted to dental school than for those who did not gain admission (3.36±0.30 vs. 2.94±0.19). Evaluation of the academic performance of URM OHS students in the first year (p=0.13) and second year (p=0.88) at GSDM showed that these students performed as well as the non‐OHS and non‐URM OHS students. These results demonstrate that the OHS master's program serves as a successful credential‐enhancing program for dental school applicants, while also serving as a pipeline to increase the number of qualified applicants from URM groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21815/jde.019.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Davies, T. A., Kaye, E., Stahlberger, M., Abbas, M., Sarkis, C., Reed, L., Dunham, L., Schreiber, B. M., Leone, C., & Mascarenhas, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Department of Health Policy & Health Services Research Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Davies, Theresa A.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
287-295
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W2913763637
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, New York University
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
dental school admissions, underrepresented minority students, academic preparation, academic performance
MeSH terms
Boston, Female, Humans, Male, Oral Health, School Admission Criteria, Schools, Dental, Students, Dental, Universities, Cultural Diversity, Vulnerable Populations, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review