CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing

·2015
DOI 10.21832/9781783093595
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book offers a discussion of theoretical and methodological issues concerning the pivotal role of working memory in second language learning and processing. It includes theoretical chapters, empirical studies providing original data and new insights into the topic, and commentary chapters which chart the course for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21832/9781783093595

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the phonological and the executive aspects of working memory tend to exercise consistent and distinctive influences on various aspects of L2 acquisition and processing.

    “numerous empirical studies in cognitive psychology and SLA have demonstrated that both the phonological and the executive aspects of working memory tend to exercise consistent and distinctive influences on various aspects of L2 acquisition and processing”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Wen 2015

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Publisher
Multilingual Matters
Published
2015-12-31
DOI
10.21832/9781783093595
Cited by
76
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review