Cited by 3Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Adaptação da Versão Portuguesa do Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory para Adolescentes: Estrutura Fatorial e Propriedades Psicométricas

Open access
Flórido, Sara, Cunha, Marina, Carreiras, Diogo, Galhardo, Ana·2024·Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica

Abstract

Resumo O objetivo do presente trabalho foi adaptar a versão portuguesa do Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-24) para a população de adolescentes.A amostra incluiu 269 jovens com idades entre os 12 e 18 anos.A análise fatorial confirmatória testou quatro modelos (seis fatores correlacionados, um fator, ordem superior e bifatorial) para cada um dos índices globais de Flexibilidade Psicológica (FP) e Inflexibilidade Psicológica (IP), separadamente.O modelo de seis fatores correlacionados e o modelo bifatorial foram os que evidenciaram um melhor ajustamento.O MPFI24-A demonstrou uma boa fidedignidade para os dois índices globais (α=.90 e α=.85, respetivamente) e uma boa fidedignidade teste-reteste.Revelou associações no sentido esperado com outros constructos de interesse (flexibilidade psicológica, sintomas de ansiedade e depressão e perceção de saúde mental).Concluindo, o MPFI24-A revelou-se um instrumento fidedigno e útil para avaliar as competências de (in)flexibilidade psicológica em adolescentes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21865/ridep72.2.05

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2ª ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
  2. Grégoire, S., Gagnon, J., Lachance, L., Shankland, R., Dionne, F., Kotsou, I., Monestès, J. L., Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación -e Avaliação Psicológica. RIDEP • Nº72 • Vol. 2 • 55-69 • 2024
  3. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7ª ed.). Pearson Education.
  4. Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Levin, M. E. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 976-1002.
  5. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2ª ed.). The Guildford Press.
  6. Nelson, E. E., & Guyer, A. E. (2011). The development of the ventral prefrontal cortex and social flexibility. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.dcn.2011.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (6ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  8. Ribeiro, J. L. P., Honrado, A. A. J. D., & Leal, I. (2004). Contribuição para o estudo da adaptação portuguesa das escalas de ansiedade, depressão e stress (EADS) de 21 itens de Lovibond e Lovibond. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 5(2), 229-239. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1058
  9. Salvador, M. C., Matos, A. P., Oliveira, S., March, J. S., Arnarson, E. O., Carey, S. C., & Craighead, Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación -e Avaliação Psicológica. RIDEP • Nº72 • Vol. 2 • 55-69 • 2024
  10. Steinberg, L. (2014). Adolescence (10ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistic (5ª ed.). Allyn and Bacon/Pearson Education.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flórido, S., Cunha, M., Carreiras, D., & Galhardo, A.
Affiliations
Instituto Superior Miguel Torga (PT)
Venue
Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica
Published
2024
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
55
ISSN
  • 1135-3848 (ISSN-L)
  • 2183-6051
OpenAlex
W4400609081
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Locations
Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological flexibility, psychological inflexibility, adolescents, Portuguese adaptation, psychometric properties, factor structure, bifactor model, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, mental health perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review