Cited by 25Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsCancer Cells and Metastasis

Osteosarcoma Patient-derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX) Models Used to Identify Novel and Effective Therapeutics: A Review

Open access
HIGUCHI, TAKASHI, IGARASHI, KENTARO, YAMAMOTO, NORIO, HAYASHI, KATSUHIRO, KIMURA, HIROAKI, MIWA, SHINJI, BOUVET, MICHAEL, TSUCHIYA, HIROYUKI +1 more·2021·Anticancer Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recurrent osteosarcoma is recalcitrant with poor response rates to first-line chemotherapy due to heterogeneity and metastatic potential. This disease requires novel drug discovery and precision treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The osteosarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model mimics the clinical disease and has identified effective clinically-approved drugs and experimental agents, especially drug combinations, that hold much clinical promise. RESULTS: Effective treatment for drug-resistant osteosarcoma includes regorafenib, as monotherapy, and temozolomide-irinotecan, trabectedin-irinotecan, sorafenib-everolimus, sorafenib-palbociclib, and olaratumab-doxorubicin-cisplatinum, as combinations. CONCLUSION: The PDOX model can be used to improve the outcome of osteosarcoma patients, including individualized, precision therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21873/anticanres.15406

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large libraries of PDX models of osteosarcoma have been developed.

    “To assist this approach, large libraries of PDX models of osteosarcoma have been developed 181,182 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [182]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HIGUCHI, T., IGARASHI, K., YAMAMOTO, N., HAYASHI, K., KIMURA, H., MIWA, S., BOUVET, M., TSUCHIYA, H., & HOFFMAN, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Anticancer Research
Published
2021-11-30
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
5865-5871
ISSN
  • 0250-7005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-7530
OpenAlex
W3215268933
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anticancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K09571, 21K09198)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
osteosarcoma, patient-derived orthotopic xenograft, drug discovery, drug resistance, precision therapy, regorafenib, combination therapy, recurrent osteosarcoma
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Neoplasms, Disease Models, Animal, Disease Susceptibility, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Humans, Osteosarcoma, Biomarkers, Tumor, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Mice, Drug Discovery, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review