Cited by 28Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Potential Risk Factors for Nivolumab-induced Thyroid Dysfunction

Open access
Haruhiko Yamazaki, Hiroyuki Iwasaki, Toshinari Yamashita, Tsutomu Yoshida, Nobuyasu Suganuma, Takashi Yamanaka, Katsuhiko Masudo, HIROTAKA NAKAYAMA +3 more·2017·In Vivo

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thyroid dysfunction is occasionally reported after the administration of nivolumab. We report on the incidence of and risk factors for nivolumab-induced thyroid dysfunction in patients with non-small lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 82 patients who received nivolumab between January 2016 and December 2016 at the Kanagawa Cancer Center were included. Prior to nivolumab treatment, 72 patients had normal thyroid function. RESULTS: Among the 72 patients with normal thyroid function prior to nivolumab treatment, the incidence of thyroid dysfunction was 19.5%. There were no significant differences between patients in whom thyroid dysfunction had occurred regarding sex, age, nivolumab dose, or thyroid function prior to nivolumab administration. However, the total number of doses of nivolumab was significantly greater in patients who developed thyroid dysfunction after nivolumab treatment (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The total number of doses administered may be a risk factor for the development of thyroid dysfunction after nivolumab therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21873/invivo.11195

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the literature, female gender is described as a risk factor for ICPi-induced thyroid dysfunction, although this is less pronounced than in spontaneous forms and is not described in all studies.

    “In the literature, female gender is described as being a risk factor for ICPi-induced TD, although this is less pronounced than in spontaneous forms [7,46,47] and it is not described in all studies [11,48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamazaki, H., Iwasaki, H., Yamashita, T., Yoshida, T., Suganuma, N., Yamanaka, T., Masudo, K., NAKAYAMA, H., Kohagura, K., Rino, Y., & Masuda, M.
Affiliations
  • Kanagawa Cancer Center (JP)
  • Yokohama City University Medical Center (JP)
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
Venue
In Vivo
Published
2017-11-05
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1225-1228
ISSN
  • 0258-851X (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-7549
OpenAlex
W2768027940
Cited by
28
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • In Vivo (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
nivolumab, thyroid dysfunction, immune checkpoint inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, risk factors, dose-dependent toxicity, incidence, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Nivolumab, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroid Gland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review