Cited by 36Smoking Behavior and CessationInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Reduced life expectancy due to smoking in large-scale cohort studies in Japan.

Open access
Ozasa, Kotaro, Katanoda, Kota, Tamakoshi, Akiko, Sato, Hiroshi, Tajima, Kazuo, Suzuki, Takaichiro, Tsugane, Shoichiro, Sobue, Tomotaka·2008·Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To show the reduction in life expectancy due to smoking and the recovery of normal life expectancy by smoking cessation is useful for tobacco control health policy. METHODS: This study included 140,026 males and 156,810 females aged 40-79 years, who were participants of large-scale cohort studies in Japan (Japan Health Center-based Prospective Study [JPHC]-I, JPHC-II, Three-Prefecture Study, and Japan Collaborative Cohort [JACC] Study), which commenced around 1990. The mean follow-up period (+/-standard deviation) was 9.6 +/- 2.3 years, during which 16,282 men and 9,418 women died. For persons aged 40-79 years grouped according to each defined smoking status in the baseline questionnaire, sex- and age-specific death rates at attained ages were calculated. The age-specific death rate was calculated by dividing the number of persons who died at the age by the number of persons who were followed-up at the attained age. From these death rates, current life tables were constructed according to the smoking status, and survival curves were plotted. RESULTS: The life expectancy of male smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers at age 40 years was 38.5, 40.8, and 42.4 years respectively. In women, the corresponding life expectancies were 42.4, 42.1, and 46.1 years. In both sexes, the age by which half of the current smokers had died was approximately 4 years younger than that for never-smokers. The life expectancies of male ex-smokers who quit smoking before ages 40, 50, 60, and 70 years were 4.8, 3.7, 1.6, and 0.5 years longer than those of smokers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Smoking considerably reduced the life expectancy, and earlier smoking cessation resulted in a better survival than that seen with continued smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2188/jea.je2007416

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of serious mental illness on life expectancy is marked and generally higher than similarly calculated impacts of well-recognised adverse exposures such as smoking, diabetes and obesity.

    “The impact of serious mental illness on life expectancy is marked and generally higher than similarly calculated impacts of well-recognised adverse exposures such as smoking, diabetes and obesity.”

    From Life Expectancy at Birth for People with Serious Mental Illness and Other Major Disorders from a Secondary Mental Health Care Case Register in London (2011) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (page not supplied) show shorter life expectancy for smokers than never-smokers, supporting the smoking comparison as an example of an adverse exposure. The paper does not assess serious mental illness, diabetes, or obesity, so it cannot support the claim that the life-expectancy impact of serious mental illness is generally greater. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozasa, K., Katanoda, K., Tamakoshi, A., Sato, H., Tajima, K., Suzuki, T., Tsugane, S., & Sobue, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP)
  • National Cancer Center (US)
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
  • Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute (JP)
  • Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
111-118
ISSN
  • 0917-5040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-9092
OpenAlex
W2099981556
Cited by
36
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
smoking, life expectancy, smoking cessation, mortality, age-specific mortality, life tables, survival, tobacco control, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Japan, Life Expectancy, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review