The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is one of the most frequent acute surgical conditions of the abdomen, and appendectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations in the world. However, epidemiological data on appendicitis have not been reported for South Korean or East Asian populations. METHODS: We analyzed the epidemiological features and lifetime risk of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea using data collected for the national health insurance database from 2005 through 2007. RESULTS: Appendectomy was performed in 59.70% of inpatients diagnosed with appendicitis. The overall incidences of appendicitis, total appendectomy, and perforated appendectomy were 22.71, 13.56, and 2.91 per 10 000 population per year, respectively. The incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy showed clear seasonality, with a peak in summer. The standardized lifetime risks of appendicitis and appendectomy were constant from 2005 through 2007. A life table model suggests that the lifetime risk of appendicitis is 16.33% for males and 16.34% for females, and that the lifetime risk of appendectomy is 9.89% for males and 9.61% for females. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to results obtained in research on Western populations, appendicitis and appendectomy had a similar perforation rate and seasonality, but a higher overall incidence, in South Koreans. Between 2005 and 2007, the incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy was constant. Overall, an estimated 15 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 inpatient with suspected appendicitis, and 26 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 appendectomy. Incidental appendectomy may have greater preventive value in Koreans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management
Bhangu, A., Søreide, K., Di Saverio, S., Assarsson, J. H., & Drake, F. T. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00275-5 · Cited by 1,303
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis
Jaschinski, T., Mosch, C. G., Eikermann, M., Neugebauer, E. A., & Sauerland, S. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001546.pub4 · Cited by 1,016
Kim, J.-A., Yoon, S., Kim, L.-Y., & Kim, D.-S. (2017) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.718 · Cited by 707
The Global Incidence of Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Population-based Studies
Ferris, M., Quan, S., Kaplan, B. S., Molodecky, N., Ball, C. G., Chernoff, G. W., Bhala, N., Ghosh, S., Dixon, E., Ng, S., et al. (2017) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002188 · Cited by 580
Ng, B., Chu, A., & Khan, M. M. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002468 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J. H., Park, Y. S., & Choi, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Japan Epidemiological Association
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 0917-5040 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-9092
- OpenAlex
- W2018040008
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2188/jea.je20090011
- The paper
- Lee, J. H., Park, Y. S., & Choi, J. S. (2010). The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data. Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20090011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.