The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference
Abstract
Do people prefer curved lines, shapes, and objects over angular lines, shapes, and objects? Angularity is one of the oldest variables in the psychology of aesthetics, but past research has not always controlled for potential confounds. Two experiments manipulated angularity while controlling for symmetry, prototypicality, and balance. Study 1 used arrays of circles and hexagons from the Preference for Balance Test. Study 2 used asymmetrical random polygons; each polygon was digitally rounded to create angular and curved versions. As predicted, people preferred the round circles more than the angular hexagons and the curved polygons more than the angular polygons. Both experiments explored whether individual differences in expertise in the arts moderated angularity's effect on preference. Multilevel models showed that training in the arts interacted with angularity, but the pattern of the interaction varied between the two experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hox, J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9781410604118 · Cited by 2,419
Cited by
Silvia, P. J. (2009) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0014632 · Cited by 340
Self-citationA snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking
Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005 · Cited by 277
Self-citationVartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006 · Cited by 265
Destination Aesthetics and Aesthetic Distance in Tourism Experience
Kirillova, K., & Lehto, X. (2015) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2014.958608 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M.
- Venue
- Empirical Studies of the Arts
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-12-19
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-42
- ISSN
- 0276-2374 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4493
- OpenAlex
- W1972399654
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2190/em.27.1.b
- The paper
- Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts. https://doi.org/10.2190/em.27.1.b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.