Cited by 114Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchAesthetic Perception and AnalysisUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies

Destination Aesthetics and Aesthetic Distance in Tourism Experience

Kirillova, Ksenia, Lehto, Xinran·2015·Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing

Abstract

Given the paucity of scholarly attention to the aesthetic component of tourism experience, this research attempted to empirically explore the roles of destination aesthetic qualities and “aesthetic distance”, that is, the perceived difference between the aesthetic properties of a destination and those of a tourist’s home environment, in the tourist’s aesthetic judgment and vacation satisfaction. The results validated a six-factor structure of aesthetic qualities, namely locale characteristics, scope, upkeep, accord, perceived age, and shape. This research noted that when tourists evaluate their home environment more positively in terms of upkeep and scope than vacation environment, they tend to perceive a destination as less beautiful. Only aesthetic distance in scope of experiential features influences vacation satisfaction. Relevant practical implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10548408.2014.958608

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic studies have shown that manipulating or enhancing perceived destination restorative qualities in a destination can directly impact the restoration outcomes of visitors.

    “Beyond mere correlation, academic studies have shown that manipulating or enhancing perceived destination restorative qualities in a destination can directly impact the restoration outcomes of visitors (Kirillova & Lehto, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirillova, K., & Lehto, X.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Kirillova, Ksenia
Venue
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1051-1068
ISSN
  • 1054-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7306
OpenAlex
W2023024653
Cited by
114
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Keywords
aesthetic distance, tourist experience, aesthetic judgment, destination attractiveness, scope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review