The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Democratic Participation: A Critical Element of Precautionary Public Health Decision-Making
Abstract
The precautionary principle is increasingly discussed in debates about threats to health and the environment, particularly when government actions might inhibit free trade. It is gaining recognition as an overarching principle of decision-making, one that underlies efforts for sustainable development. Pronouncements about the precautionary principle have focused generally on the responsibility of government to act in the face of uncertainty and the shifting of burdens onto proponents. This assumes that government will have the resources, knowledge, expertise, and will to act. The role of the public—those who may be affected by environmental degradation or their representatives—is mostly missing from the discussions. This article outlines a rationale for why participation is critical and explores the theory of citizen participation. The article also describes participatory models used around the world, primarily examples of citizen participation though various models also exist for workers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adoption and continued use of EBPs is challenging due to the complex and fragmented methods of financing health services [21–23].”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Coupled with the fact that variable implementation costs (e.g., training and consultation, measurement-based care) are often not covered by traditional service-focused financing options like health insurance [21, 22], the pathway to financing an EBP or implementation strategy becomes even less straightforward.”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Altogether, payments to providers and provider organizations from funding agencies account for most healthcare expenditures (e.g., 87% in the USA [21, 22])”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Coupled with the fact that variable implementation costs (e.g., training and consultation, measurement-based care) are often not covered by traditional service-focused financing options like health insurance [21, 22], the pathway to financing an EBP or implementation strategy becomes even less straightforward.”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5653 · Cited by 1,438
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms
Fiorino, D. J. (1990) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399001500204 · Cited by 1,367
Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation
(1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8 · Cited by 808
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3000 · Cited by 783
Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse
Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. M. (1995) · Cited by 722
Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe
Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 503
Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1992) · Cited by 467
“Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick
Webler, T. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_3 · Cited by 441
Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making
Laird, F. N. (1993) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399301800305 · Cited by 388
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle
- Funtowicz S., 1992, Social Theories of Risk, 251
- Arnstein S., American Insitute of Planners Journal, 216
- Sclove R., Democratic Politics of Technology: The Missing Half—Using Democratic Criteria in Participatory Technology Decisions
- Lewis S., 1996, Social Justice, 23, 4
- Joss S., Consensus Conferences: A Review of the Danish, Dutch and UK Approaches to this Special Form of Technology Assessment, and an Assessment of the Options for a Proposed Swiss Consensus Conference
- Fixdal J., 1996, The Danish Scenario Workshops
- Bilderbeek R., 1994, Involving Citizens in Sustainable Development: Experiences from European Scenario Workshops on Urban Ecology
- Caldart C., 1999, The Harvard Environmental Law Review, 23, 141
- Aurela L., 1995, Boston College Environmental Law Review, 23, 87
- Stirling A., 1999, On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frith, L. (2023) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhad024 · Cited by 61
Deliberation, Democracy, and Civic Forums: Improving Equality and Publicity
Karpowitz, C. F., & Raphael, C. (2014) · Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) · Cited by 57
Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices
Dopp, A. R., Kerns, S. E. U., Panattoni, L., Ringel, J. S., Eisenberg, D., Powell, B. J., Low, R., & Raghavan, R. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01137-9 · Cited by 52
Tickner, J. A. (2002) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1016/s0033-3549(04)50193-0 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDopp, A. R., Gilbert, M., Silovsky, J. F., Ringel, J. S., Schmidt, S. R., Funderburk, B. W., Jorgensen, A. G., Powell, B. J., Luke, D. A., Mandell, D. S., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00234-6 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Tickner, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tickner, Joel A.
- ORCID
- Tickner, Joel A.
- Venue
- NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-111
- ISSN
- 1048-2911 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3772
- OpenAlex
- W2088842869
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Keywords
- precautionary principle, democratic participation, citizen participation, public health decision-making, environmental health, sustainable development, uncertainty, burden shifting, participatory model, employee participation, environmental degradation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
