The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Successful Aging, Life Satisfaction, and Generativity in Later Life
Abstract
This article explores the meanings older people attach to successful aging and life satisfaction and how these concepts can be differentiated. Forty elderly employees of the Ozarks Area Foster Grandparent Program (ages 61–92) were randomly selected and interviewed using an open-ended survey questionnaire. These questions explored understandings of successful aging and life satisfaction, the factors essential for each, and the differences perceived between these concepts. Qualitative data were coded by two independent reviewers. Respondents' understandings of successful aging involved attitudinal or coping orientations nearly twice as often as those for life satisfaction. Descriptions of life satisfaction emphasized the fulfillment of basic needs and was viewed as a precursor to successful aging. Content analysis confirmed five features of successful aging: interactions with others, a sense of purpose, self-acceptance, personal growth, and autonomy. The findings suggest that generativity contributes to successful aging and remains a vital developmental task in later life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2012) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs034 · Cited by 135
Creativity in older adults: a plethora of possibilities
Flood, M., & Phillips, K. D. (2007) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840701252956 · Cited by 131
Van Wagenen, A., Driskell, J., & Bradford, J. (2013) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.09.001 · Cited by 126
The Relationship between Grandparent Satisfaction, Meaning, and Generativity
Thiele, D. M., & Whelan, T. A. (2008) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/ag.66.1.b · Cited by 116
Caregiver Stress Among Grandparents Raising Grandchildren: The Functional Role of Social Support
Landry-Meyer, L., Gerard, J. M., & Guzell, J. R. (2005) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1300/j002v37n01_11 · Cited by 74
The emerging role of euthymia in psychotherapy research and practice
Guidi, J., & Fava, G. A. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101941 · Cited by 40
Contribution of Generative Leisure Activities to Cognitive Function in Elderly Sri Lankan Adults
Maselko, J., Sebranek, M., Mun, M. H., Perera, B., Ahs, J., & Østbye, T. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12985 · Cited by 27
Respect Your Elders: Generativity and Life Satisfaction in Caregiving Grandparents
Scott, R. K., Nadorff, D. K., Barnett, M., & Yancura, L. (2023) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/00914150221092128 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, B. J.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-250
- ISSN
- 0091-4150 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3535
- OpenAlex
- W2032966193
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
