Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryClassical Studies and Philology

Hezekiah’s Illness and the “Steps of Ahaz”: A Proposal for Dating the Story’s Emergence in Light of a Solar Eclipse

Open access
Bloch, Yigal·2026·Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny

Abstract

This article deals with the story of Hezekiah’s illness and recovery (2 Kgs 20:1–11 // Isa 38), which forms part of the narrative of Hezekiah’s reign in the books of Kings and Isaiah. Despite its integration in the larger narrative, this story was originally a self-contained literary unit. The article discusses the relationship between the story’s versions in Kings and Isaiah, concurring with the prevailing view that the Isaiah version is an adaptation of that in Kings, as well as the story’s inner structure, where the original kernel (2 Kgs 20:1–7) was later supplemented with the miraculous element of the shadow receding ten steps on “the steps of Ahaz” to mark Hezekiah’s recovery. The article suggests that the event that gave rise to this addition was the solar eclipse of January 12, 662 BCE, implying that the story’s original kernel existed prior to that date.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21906/rbl.3783

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. S0036930600058786 · DOI
  2. Balogh, C. (2023). Shadows on the sundial of Ahaz and new light on the troubled history of Isaiah 38:8 and 2 Kings 20:11. Vetus Testamentum, 73(3), 327-359.
  3. Begg, C. T. (1986), 2 Kings 20:12-19 as an element of the Deuteronomistic History. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 48(1), 27-38.
  4. Clements, R. E. (1983). The Isaiah narrative of 2 Kings 20:12-19 and the date of the Deuteronomic History. In A. Rofé & Y. Zakovitch (Eds.), Isac Leo Seeligmann Volume: Essays on the Bible and the ancient world (Vol. 3; pp. 209-220).
  5. Gonçalves, F. J. (1999). 2 Rois 18,13-20 par. Isaïe 36-39: Encore une fois, lequel des deux livres fut le premier? In J.-M. Auwers & A. Wénin (Eds.), Lectures et relectures de la Bible: Festschrift P.-M. Bogaert (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium, 144; pp. 27-55).
  6. Grayson, A. K. (1980-1983). Königslisten und Chroniken. B. Akkadisch. In D. O. Edzard et al. (Eds.), Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie (Vol. 6, pp. 86-135). De Gruyter.
  7. Koch-Westenholz, U. (2001). Babylonian views of eclipses. In R. Gyselen (Ed.), Démons et merveilles d'Orient (Res Orientales, 13; pp. 71-84). Groupe pour l'Étude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient.
  8. Na'aman, N. (2024). Hezekiah's years of reign in light of the epigraphic evidence. In R. Deutsch & A. Lemaire (Eds.), Gabriel: Tell this man the meaning of his vision (Daniel 8:16), Studies in archaeology, epigraphy, iconography and the Biblical world in honor of Gabriel Barkay on the occasion of his 80th birthday (22 June 2024) (pp. 216-230). Archaeological Center Publications.
  9. Nelson, R. D. (1982). The double redaction of the Deuteronomistic History (Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series, 18). Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Press.
  10. Oded, B. (2012). 2 Kings 20:17-18 (= Isa 39:5-7) -ipsissima verba or vaticinium ex eventu: Historiographic and theological observations. In M. I. Gruber, A. Brenner, M. Garsiel, B. A. Levine & M. Mor (Eds.), Teshura le-Zafrira: Studies in the Bible, the history of Israel and the Ancient Near East presented to Zafrira Ben-Barak (pp. *69-*86). The Ben-Gurion University Press.
  11. Zakovitch, Y. (1985). Assimilation in Biblical narratives. In J. Tigay (Ed.), Empirical models for Biblical criticism (pp. 175-196). University of Pennsylvania Press.

Authors
Bloch, Y.
Affiliations
Bible Lands Museum Jerusalem
Corresponding author
Bloch, Yigal
Venue
Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny
Published
2026-03-31
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
5-25
ISSN
  • 0209-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 2391-8497
OpenAlex
W7210271302
Cited by
0
References
24
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
Locations
  • Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
literary composition, Ahaz, Hebrew Bible narrative

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review