Cited by 1Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryAncient Egypt and Archaeology

Chronological Notes on the Reigns of Hezekiah and Hoshea

Bloch, Yigal·2025·Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft

Abstract

The recent study by Nadav Naʾaman on the Judean »fiscal« bullae from private collections supports the reliability of the synchronism between the deaths of Ahaz and Tiglath-pileser III in Isa 14:28–29. Close attention to this synchronism and to the way it is anchored in Mesopotamian chronology dates the death of Ahaz and the enthronement of Hezekiah to 727/6 BCE (a year later than suggested by Naʾaman) and leads to important conclusions concerning the calendars and the systems of counting regnal years practiced in the courts of Hezekiah of Judah and his contemporary, Hoshea of Israel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/zaw-2025-2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloch, Y.
Affiliations
Bible Lands Museum Jerusalem Shmuel Stephan Wise St 21 IL-Jerusalem Israel
Corresponding author
Bloch, Yigal
Venue
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Published
2025-05-01
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
226-239
ISSN
  • 0044-2526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-0103
OpenAlex
W4410533216
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
22.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
Hezekiah, Ahaz, Tiglath-pileser III, synchronism, Mesopotamian chronology, calendars, Judah, Israel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review