The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction
Open accessAbstract
Credit card defaults pause a business-critical threat in banking systems thus prompt detection of defaulters is a crucial and challenging research problem. Machine learning algorithms must deal with a heavily skewed dataset since the ratio of defaulters to non-defaulters is very small. The purpose of this research is to apply different ensemble methods and compare their performance in detecting the probability of defaults customer’s credit card default payments in Taiwan from the UCI Machine learning repository. This is done on both the original skewed dataset and then on balanced dataset several studies have showed the superiority of neural networks as compared to traditional machine learning algorithms, the results of our study show that ensemble methods consistently outperform Neural Networks and other machine learning algorithms in terms of F1 score and area under receiver operating characteristic curve regardless of balancing the dataset or ignoring the imbalance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Faraj, A. A., Mahmud, D. A., & Rashid, B. N.
- Affiliations
- Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
- University of Sulaimani (IQ)
- Venue
- UHD Journal of Science and Technology
- Publisher
- University of Human Development
- Published
- 2021-07-19
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 2521-4209 (ISSN-L)
- 2521-4217
- OpenAlex
- W3196165629
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- UHD Journal of Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Keywords
- credit card default prediction, ensemble methods, class imbalance, data balancing, artificial neural networks, F1 score, ROC curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21928/uhdjst.v5n2y2021.pp20-25
- The paper
- Faraj, A. A., Mahmud, D. A., & Rashid, B. N. (2021). Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction. UHD Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdjst.v5n2y2021.pp20-25