Cited by 17Financial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesCustomer churn and segmentation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction

Open access
Faraj, Azhi Abdalmohammed, Mahmud, Didam Ahmed, Rashid, Bilal Najmaddin·2021·UHD Journal of Science and Technology

Abstract

Credit card defaults pause a business-critical threat in banking systems thus prompt detection of defaulters is a crucial and challenging research problem. Machine learning algorithms must deal with a heavily skewed dataset since the ratio of defaulters to non-defaulters is very small. The purpose of this research is to apply different ensemble methods and compare their performance in detecting the probability of defaults customer’s credit card default payments in Taiwan from the UCI Machine learning repository. This is done on both the original skewed dataset and then on balanced dataset several studies have showed the superiority of neural networks as compared to traditional machine learning algorithms, the results of our study show that ensemble methods consistently outperform Neural Networks and other machine learning algorithms in terms of F1 score and area under receiver operating characteristic curve regardless of balancing the dataset or ignoring the imbalance

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21928/uhdjst.v5n2y2021.pp20-25

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 17

Metadata

Authors
Faraj, A. A., Mahmud, D. A., & Rashid, B. N.
Affiliations
  • Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
  • University of Sulaimani (IQ)
Venue
UHD Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2021-07-19
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
20-25
ISSN
  • 2521-4209 (ISSN-L)
  • 2521-4217
OpenAlex
W3196165629
Cited by
17
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • UHD Journal of Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
Keywords
credit card default prediction, ensemble methods, class imbalance, data balancing, artificial neural networks, F1 score, ROC curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21928/uhdjst.v5n2y2021.pp20-25
The paper
Faraj, A. A., Mahmud, D. A., & Rashid, B. N. (2021). Comparison of Different Ensemble Methods in Credit Card Default Prediction. UHD Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdjst.v5n2y2021.pp20-25