Cited by 51Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overview

Comparing King, Gentoo, and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation

Open access
HOLMES, NICK D.·2007·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

For wildlife managers, determining inter‐species differences in the behavioral responses of seabirds to visitation can allow greater efficacy of visitor guidelines. Two key management outcomes for such information include 1) tailoring visitor guidelines to protect the most sensitive species and 2) improving self‐regulation during visits by identifying behaviors likely to indicate a change in the natural activity of visited species. On subantarctic Macquarie Island, Australia, I collected the behavioral responses of guarding king ( Aptenodytes patagonicus ), gentoo ( Pygoscelis papua ), and royal ( Eudyptes schlegeli ) penguins before, during, and after exposure to a standardized pedestrian visit, to compare species' behavioral responses to visitation. Gentoo penguins appeared more sensitive than royal or king penguins, exhibiting altered behavior for 5 minutes after the stimulus was removed; this pattern was not evident in kings or royals. Response behaviors useful for visitors to assess their impact on penguins include vigilance (repeated rapid head turning) in all 3 species, agonism in king and royal penguins (reaching and striking at conspecifics), and low threat‐display (bill pointing) in gentoo penguins. This study is valuable for wildlife managers as it provides practical information in the application of on‐ground visitor guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2193/2005-715

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOLMES, N. D.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
HOLMES, NICK D.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
71
Issue
8
Pages
2575-2582
ISSN
  • 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-2817
OpenAlex
W2147636301
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
king penguin, gentoo penguin, royal penguin, human visitation, wildlife disturbance, vigilance behavior, agonistic behavior, threat display, Macquarie Island, species differences, self-regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review