Cited by 156Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Nature-based tourism impacts on Yellow-eyed penguins Megadyptes antipodes: Does unregulated visitor access affect fledging weight and juvenile survival?

McClung, Maureen R., Seddon, Philip J., Massaro, M., Setiawan, A.N.·2004·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.012

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClung, M. R., Seddon, P. J., Massaro, M., & Setiawan, A. N.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Seddon, Philip J.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
279-285
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038421242
Cited by
156
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Otago
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
yellow-eyed penguin, Megadyptes antipodes, wildlife tourism, human disturbance, fledging weight, juvenile survival, chick growth, breeding sites, Otago Peninsula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review