Survival and Cause‐Specific Mortality of Red Foxes in Agricultural and Urban Areas of Illinois
Abstract
Range expansion and population increase by coyotes ( Canis latrans ), reduced hunting and trapping, and intensified agricultural practices in the Midwest have altered red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) mortality, although relative impacts of these factors are unknown. We examined mortality causes and survival of red foxes in urban and rural agricultural areas of Illinois, using radio telemetry data from 335 foxes (Nov 1996 to May 2002). We used Akaike's Information Criterion to evaluate six survival models for foxes reflecting 1) environmental effects, 2) intrinsic effects, 3) temporal effects, 4) behavioral effects, 5) social effects, and 6) a global model. Environmental and intrinsic models of survival were optimal for adult foxes. Adult foxes with low (0‐20%) and high (80‐100%) percentages of row crops in their home ranges had higher survival than adults with moderate percentages (40‐70%). Heavier adults at capture also survived better. A global model (all covariates) was optimal for juvenile foxes. Higher juvenile survival associated with larger litters, lower body fat, and reduced dispersal time. Yearly survival ranged from 0.18 for rural male juveniles to 0.44 for rural female adults. Adult survival rates (0.35) were 11% higher than juvenile survival rates (0.24). Yearly survival varied for urban foxes due to cyclic outbreaks of sarcoptic mange ( Sarcoptes scabei ). Thus, summer survival (May‐Sep) of urban juveniles ranged from 0.10 (mange present) to 0.83 (no mange recorded). M…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coyotes may kill foxes.
“Coyotes, in turn, may kill foxes (Sargeant & Allen 1989;Farias et al. 2005;Gosselink et al. 2007).”
From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Gosselink et al. 2007
Cites
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387 · see citing works
Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates
Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., & Gitzen, R. A. (1999) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802664 · Cited by 1,390 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes
Newsome, T. M., & Ripple, W. J. (2015) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12258 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Noninvasive Sampling Reveals Short-Term Genetic Rescue in an Insular Red Fox Population
Quinn, C. B., Alden, P. B., & Sacks, B. N. (2019) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esz024 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- GOSSELINK, T. E., VAN DEELEN, T. R., WARNER, R. E., & MANKIN, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Illinois Natural History Survey (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- GOSSELINK, TODD E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1862-1873
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W2110067767
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- red fox, survival, cause-specific mortality, sarcoptic mange, coyote predation, hunting mortality, roadkill, agricultural land use, row crops, juvenile survival, litter size, fat mass, dispersal, Illinois, wildlife management, source-sink dynamics, radio telemetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review