Cited by 34Genetic diversity and population structureWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Noninvasive Sampling Reveals Short-Term Genetic Rescue in an Insular Red Fox Population

Open access
Quinn, Cate B, Alden, Preston B, Sacks, Benjamin N·2019·Journal of Heredity

Abstract

Genetic factors in the decline of small populations are extremely difficult to study in nature. We leveraged a natural experiment to investigate evidence of inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a remnant population of subalpine-specialized Sierra Nevada red foxes (Vulpes vulpes necator) using noninvasive genetic monitoring during 2010–2017. Only 7 individuals were detected in the first 2 years. These individuals assigned genetically to the historical population and exhibited genetic hallmarks of inbreeding and no evidence of reproduction. Two years into the study, we detected 2 first-generation immigrant males from a recently expanding population of red foxes in the Great Basin Desert. Through annual resampling of individuals (634 red fox DNA samples, 41 individuals) and molecular reconstruction of pedigrees, we documented 1–3 litters/year for 5 years, all descended directly or indirectly from matings involving immigrant foxes. The observed heterozygosity and allelic richness of the population nearly doubled in 2 years. Abundance increased, indicative of a rapidly expanding population. Throughout the study, adult survival was high. Restoration of gene flow apparently improved the demographic trajectory of this population in the short term. Whether these benefits continue in the longer term could depend on numerous factors, such as maintenance of any locally adapted alleles. This study highlights the value of noninvasive genetic monitoring to assess rapidly shifting conditions in small populations. Uncertainties about the longer-term trajectory of this population underscore the need to continue monitoring and to research potential for both negative and positive aspects of continued genetic infusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jhered/esz024

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Average genotyping success (52.8%) was consistent with previous studies based on faecal DNA (e.g., 48%, 58%).

    “Average genotyping success (52.8%) was consistent with previous studies based on faecal DNA (e.g., 48%44, 58%45).”

    From Nutritional ecology of a prototypical generalist predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Individual Assignments section reports that 363 of 634 red fox samples (57%) yielded usable genotypes, supporting the comparison with a roughly similar faecal-DNA success rate. It does not report the cited 58%; the 48% figure is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alden PB. 2017. Distribution and origins of the red fox in the Great Basin [master's thesis]. [Davis (CA)]: University of California.
  2. Aubry KB. 1983. The Cascade red fox: distribution, morphology, zoogeog- raphy and ecology [doctoral dissertation]. [Seattle (WA)]: University of Washington.
  3. Grinnell J, Dixon JS, Linsdale JM. 1937. Fur-bearing mammals of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  4. Park S. 2001. Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population gen- etic effects of selection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Dublin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, C. B., Alden, P. B., & Sacks, B. N.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Quinn, Cate B
Venue
Journal of Heredity
Published
2019-04-19
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
559-576
ISSN
  • 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7333
OpenAlex
W2937379636
Cited by
34
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (F16AC0054)
  • U.S. Forest Service (12-CS-11052007-021, 16-CS-11051600-023, 11-CS-11041702-046, 16-CS-f 1041730-034)
  • National Park Service (P15AC01816)
  • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (P1080019)
  • National Science Foundation (1650042)
  • UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
genetic rescue, inbreeding depression, non-invasive genetic sampling, gene flow, heterozygosity, allelic richness, population growth, local adaptation
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Foxes, Genetics, Population, Geography, Hybridization, Genetic, Inbreeding, Pedigree, Reproduction, Genetic Variation, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review