Cited by 52Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Florida Panther Habitat Selection Analysis of Concurrent GPS and VHF Telemetry Data

LAND, E. DARRELL, SHINDLE, DAVID B., KAWULA, ROBERT J., BENSON, JOHN F., LOTZ, MARK A., ONORATO, DAVE P.·2008·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

Abstract: Florida panthers ( Puma concolor coryi ) are listed as an endangered subspecies in the United States and they exist in a single Florida population with <100 individuals; all known reproduction occurs south of Lake Okeechobee. Habitat loss is the biggest threat to this small population and previous studies of habitat selection have relied on very high frequency (VHF) telemetry data collected almost exclusively during diurnal periods. We investigated habitat selection of 12 panthers in the northern portion of the breeding range using 1) Global Positioning System (GPS) telemetry data collected during nocturnal and diurnal periods and 2) VHF telemetry data collected only during diurnal periods. Analysis of both types of telemetry data yielded similar results as panthers selected upland ( P < 0.001) and wetland ( P < 0.001) forested habitat types. Our results indicated that forests are the habitats selected by panthers and generally support the current United States Fish and Wildlife Service panther habitat ranking system. We suggest that future studies with greater numbers of panthers should investigate panther habitat selection using GPS telemetry data collected throughout the range of the Florida panther and with location attempts scheduled more evenly across the diel period. Global Positioning System radiocollars were effective at obtaining previously unavailable nocturnal telemetry data on panthers; however, we recommend that panther researchers continue to collect VHF telemetry data until acquisition rates and durability of GPS collars improve. (JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 72(3):633–639; 2008)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2193/2007-136

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of previous resource selection analyses for panthers in southern Florida were third-order selections (habitat within home ranges).

    “the majority of these analyses were third order selections (habitat within home ranges) [4–9]”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Male and female panthers do not select significantly different habitat.

    “Male and female panthers do not select significantly different habitat [8, 9]”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

  • The 1.0 km grid size was chosen to account for telemetry error (within 124-230 m) and because of interest in analyzing panther habitat characteristics at the landscape scale.

    “This grid size was chosen to account for telemetry error (within 124–230 m [4, 8, 11]) and because of our interest in analyzing panther habitat characteristics at the landscape scale.”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

  • In south Florida, forested habitats have been shown to be important to panthers, although the region is topographically flat.

    “and in south Florida forested habitats have been shown to be important to panthers [4–9, 38], although it is topographically flat [39].”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Upland forests ranked high in habitats selected within panther home ranges.

    “However, upland forests ranked high in habitats selected within panther home ranges [6–9].”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Beier P., 2003, An analysis of scientific literature related to the Florida panther
  2. Davis J. H., 1943, The natural features of southern Florida
  3. Orio A. P., 2003, Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31, 372
  4. Dussault C., 1999, Evaluation of GPS telemetry collar performance for habitat studies in the boreal forest, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 965
  5. Hooge P. N., 2000, Animal movement extension to Arcview. Version 2.0
  6. Kautz R., 2007, Florida vegetation 2003 and land use change between 1985–89 and 2003, Florida Scientist, 70, 12
  7. Maehr D. S., 1991, Social ecology of Florida panthers, National Geographic Research and Exploration, 7, 414
  8. Maehr D. S., 1990, Day beds, natal dens, and activity of Florida panthers, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 44, 310
  9. White G. C., 1990, Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LAND, E. D., SHINDLE, D. B., KAWULA, R. J., BENSON, J. F., LOTZ, M. A., & ONORATO, D. P.
Affiliations
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US)
Corresponding author
  • LAND, E. DARRELL
  • SHINDLE, DAVID B.
  • BENSON, JOHN F.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
633-639
ISSN
  • 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-2817
OpenAlex
W2121292605
Cited by
52
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
Florida panther, Puma concolor coryi, habitat selection, GPS tracking, VHF telemetry, nocturnal activity, diel activity patterns, threatened species, habitat loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review