The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Impacts of Wind‐Energy Development on Nocturnally Active Birds and Bats: A Guidance Document
Abstract
ABSTRACT Our purpose is to provide researchers, consultants, decision‐makers, and other stakeholders with guidance to methods and metrics for investigating nocturnally active birds and bats in relation to utility‐scale wind‐energy development. The primary objectives of such studies are to 1) assess potential impacts on resident and migratory species, 2) quantify fatality rates on resident and migratory populations, 3) determine the causes of bird and bat fatalities, and 4) develop, assess, and implement methods for reducing risks to bird and bat populations and their habitats. We describe methods and tools and their uses, discuss limitations, assumptions, and data interpretation, present case studies and examples, and offer suggestions for improving studies on nocturnally active birds and bats in relation to wind‐energy development. We suggest best practices for research and monitoring studies using selected methods and metrics, but this is not intended as cookbook. We caution that each proposed and executed study will be different, and that decisions about which methods and metrics to use will depend upon several considerations, including study objectives, expected and realized risks to bird and bat populations, as well as budgetary and logistical considerations. Developed to complement and extend the existing National Wind Coordinating Committee document “Methods and Metrics for Assessing Impacts of Wind Energy Facilities on Wildlife” (Anderson et al. 1999), we provide information that stakeholders can use to aid in evaluating potential and actual impacts of wind power development on nocturnally active birds and bats. We hope that decision‐makers will find these guidelines helpful as they assemble information needed to support the permitting process, and that the public will use this guidance document as they participate in the permitting processes. We further hope that the wind industry will find valuable guidance from this document when 1) complying with data requirements as a part of the permitting process, 2) evaluating sites for potential development, 3) assessing impacts of operational wind‐energy facilities, and 4) mitigating local and cumulative impacts on nocturnally active birds and bats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
Environmental impact of wind energy
Saidur, R., Rahim, N. A., Islam, M. R., & Solangi, K. H. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.024 · Cited by 649
Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions
Cryan, P. M., & Barclay, R. M. R. (2009) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/09-mamm-s-076r1.1 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- KUNZ, T. H., ARNETT, E. B., COOPER, B. M., ERICKSON, W. P., LARKIN, R. P., MABEE, T., MORRISON, M. L., STRICKLAND, M. D., & SZEWCZAK, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2449-2486
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W2132345782
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Impacts of Wind‐Energy Development on Nocturnally Active Birds and Bats: A Guidance Document. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2193/2007-270
- The paper
- KUNZ, T. H., ARNETT, E. B., COOPER, B. M., ERICKSON, W. P., LARKIN, R. P., MABEE, T., MORRISON, M. L., STRICKLAND, M. D., & SZEWCZAK, J. M. (2007). Assessing Impacts of Wind‐Energy Development on Nocturnally Active Birds and Bats: A Guidance Document. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.