Cited by 104Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

A new grid for the IFS

Open access
Malardel, S., Wedi, Nils, Deconinck, Willem, Diamantakis, Michail, Kuehnlein, Christian, Mozdzynski, G., Hamrud, M., Smolarkiewicz, Piotr·2016·ECMWF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.21957/zwdu9u5i

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Malardel, S., Wedi, N., Deconinck, W., Diamantakis, M., Kuehnlein, C., Mozdzynski, G., Hamrud, M., & Smolarkiewicz, P.
Affiliations
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
Venue
ECMWF
Publisher
ECMWF
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W6944576743
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Keywords
numerical weather prediction, IFS, model grid, grid resolution, atmospheric models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review