Cited by 82Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Use by Older AdultsPersona Design and Applications

Using Human-Centered Design to Build a Digital Health Advisor for Patients With Complex Needs: Persona and Prototype Development

Open access
Bhattacharyya, Onil, Mossman, Kathryn, Gustafsson, Lovisa, Schneider, Eric C·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twenty years ago, a "Guardian Angel" or comprehensive digital health advisor was proposed to empower patients to better manage their own health. This is now technically feasible, but most digital applications have narrow functions and target the relatively healthy, with few designed for those with the greatest needs. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to identify unmet needs and key features of a general digital health advisor for frail elderly and people with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers. METHODS: In-depth interviews were used to develop personas and use cases, and iterative feedback from participants informed the creation of a low-fidelity prototype of a digital health advisor. Results were shared with developers, investors, regulators, and health system leaders for suggestions on how this could be developed and disseminated. RESULTS: Patients highlighted the following goals: "live my life," "love my life," "manage my health," and "feel understood." Patients and caregivers reported interest in four functions to address these goals: tracking and insights, advice and information, providing a holistic picture of the patient, and coordination and communication. Experts and system stakeholders felt the prototype was technically feasible, and that while health care delivery organizations could help disseminate such a tool, it should be done in partnership with consumer-focused organizations. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the key features of a comprehensive digital health advisor, but to spur its development, we need to clarify the business case and address the policy, organizational, and cultural barriers to creating tools that put patients and their goals at the center of the health system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10318

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Designing a high-performing health care system for patients with complex needs: ten recommendations for policymakers—expanded and revised edition 2018 2018-01-08 The Commonwealth Fund https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/files/documents/___media_files_publications_fund_report_2017_aug_roland_10_recommendations_for_complex_patients_revisedexpanded.pdf
  2. [37]Bhattacharyya O Shah A Gusafsson L A digital health advisor for high-need, high-cost patients; exploring needs, functions and system constraints 2017 AMIA Annual Symposium 2017 Washington

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhattacharyya, O., Mossman, K., Gustafsson, L., & Schneider, E. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Commonwealth Fund (US)
Corresponding author
Bhattacharyya, Onil
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-05-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
e10318
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907799275
Cited by
82
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Fund
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
Keywords
guardian angels, human-centered design, frail elderly, multimorbidity, caregivers, complex care needs, personas, low-fidelity prototypes, patient empowerment, unmet needs, stakeholder engagement, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Delivery of Health Care, Health Planning, Humans, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review