The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Patient portals offer modern digital tools for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) to engage in their health management. However, there are barriers to portal adoption among older adults. Understanding portal user interface and user experience (UI and UX) preferences of older adults with MCC may improve the accessibility, acceptability, and adoption of patient portals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a framework for qualitatively describing the UI and UX, intent to use, and use behaviors among older patients with MCC. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative descriptive study of Kaiser Permanente Colorado's established patient portal, My Health Manager. Older patients (N=24; mean 78.41 (SD 5.4) years) with MCC participated in focus groups. Stratified random sampling was used to maximize age and experience with the portal among participants. The semistructured focus groups used a combination of discussion and think-aloud strategies. A total of 2 coders led the theoretically driven analysis based on the TAM to determine themes related to use behavior, portal usefulness and ease of use, and intent to use. RESULTS: Portal users commonly used email, pharmacy, and lab results sections of the portal. Although, generally, the portal was seen to be easy to use, simple, and quick, challenges related to log-ins, UI design (color and font), and specific features were identified. Such challenges inhibited participants' intent to use the portal entirely or specific features. Participants indicated that the portal improved patient-provider communication, saved time and money, and provided relevant health information. Participants intended to use features that were beneficial to their health management and easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults are interested in using patient portals and are already taking advantage of the features available to them. We have the opportunity to better engage older adults in portal use but need to pay close attention to key considerations promoting usefulness and ease of use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2016) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,690
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Saldana, J. (2025) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036235611 · Cited by 17,944
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393617742282 · Cited by 2,475
The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence
Grove, S. K., Burns, N., & Gray, J. (2008) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 2,210
Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption
Tang, P. C., Ash, J. S., Bates, D. W., Overhage, J. M., & Sands, D. Z. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2025 · Cited by 1,437
Whitehead, L., & Seaton, P. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4883 · Cited by 743
The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design
JASPERS, M., STEEN, T., BOS, C., & GEENEN, M. (2004) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.003 · Cited by 544
Computer, Internet, and E-mail Use Among Older Adults: Benefits and Barriers
Gatto, S. L., & Tak, S. H. (2008) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601270802243697 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Bertolazzi, A., Quaglia, V., & Bongelli, R. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5 · Cited by 399
Carini, E., Villani, L., Pezzullo, A. M., Gentili, A., Barbara, A., Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26189 · Cited by 275
Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Luo, S., Xie, Y., Liu, F., Li, X., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15023 · Cited by 207
Hicks, J. P., Allsop, M. J., Akaba, G. O., Yalma, R. M., Dirisu, O., Okusanya, B., Tukur, J., Okunade, K., Akeju, D., Ajepe, A., et al. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/24182 · Cited by 26
Du, Y., Dennis, B., Rhodes, S. L., Sia, M., Ko, J., Jiwani, R., & Wang, J. (2020) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/21183 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Portz, J. D., Bayliss, E. A., Bull, S., Boxer, R. S., Bekelman, D. B., Gleason, K., & Czaja, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2019-04-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e11604
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912472800
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 78.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/11604
- The paper
- Portz, J. D., Bayliss, E. A., Bull, S., Boxer, R. S., Bekelman, D. B., Gleason, K., & Czaja, S. (2019). Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/11604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.