Cited by 60Healthcare RegulationDigitalization, Law, and RegulationBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Medical Device Apps: An Introduction to Regulatory Affairs for Developers

Open access
Keutzer, Lina, Simonsson, Ulrika SH·2020·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) scandal in France prompted a revision of the regulations regarding the marketing of medical devices. The new Medical Device Regulation (MDR [EU]) 2017/745 was developed and entered into force on May 25, 2017. After a transition period of 3 years, the regulations must be implemented in all EU and European Economic Area member states. The implementation of this regulation bears many changes for medical device development and marketing, including medical device software and mobile apps. Medical device development and marketing is a complex process by which manufacturers must keep many regulatory requirements and obligations in mind. The objective of this paper is to provide an introduction and overview of regulatory affairs for manufacturers that are new to the field of medical device software and apps with a specific focus on the new MDR, accompanying harmonized standards, and guidance documents from the European Commission. This work provides a concise overview of the qualification and classification of medical device software and apps, conformity assessment routes, technical documentation, clinical evaluation, the involvement of notified bodies, and the unique device identifier. Compared to the previous Medical Device Directive (MDD) 93/42/EEC, the MDR provides greater detail about the requirements for software qualification and classification. In particular, rule 11 sets specific rules for the classification of medical device software and will be described in this paper. In comparison to the previous MDD, the MDR is more stringent, especially regarding the classification of health apps and software. The implementation of the MDR in May 2020 and its interpretation by the authorities will demonstrate how app and software manufacturers as well as patients will be affected by the regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/17567

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In nonclinical settings, online peer support groups and other resources can provide a safe environment for patients with depression to receive care and support.

    “In nonclinical settings, online peer support groups and other resources 111-113 can provide a safe environment for patients with depression to receive care and support.”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keutzer, L., & Simonsson, U. S.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Simonsson, Ulrika SH
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2020-06-26
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
e17567
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022499025
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
medical device regulation, medical device software, mobile health apps, regulatory affairs, software classification, conformity assessment, notified bodies, unique device identifiers, clinical evaluation, technical documentation
MeSH terms
France, Humans, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review