Cited by 183Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Rural telemedicine use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: repeated cross-sectional study.

Open access
Chu, Cherry, Cram, Peter, Pang, Andrea, Stamenova, Vess, Tadrous, Mina, Bhatia, R Sacha·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a notable increase in telemedicine adoption. However, the impact of the pandemic on telemedicine use at a population level in rural and remote settings remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate changes in the rate of telemedicine use among rural populations and identify patient characteristics associated with telemedicine use prior to and during the pandemic. Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study on all monthly and quarterly rural telemedicine visits from January 2012 to June 2020, using administrative data from Ontario, Canada. We compared the changes in telemedicine use among residents of rural and urban regions of Ontario prior to and during the pandemic. Results: Before the pandemic, telemedicine use was steadily low in 2012-2019 for both rural and urban populations but slightly higher overall for rural patients (11 visits per 1000 patients vs 7 visits per 1000 patients in December 2019, P<.001). The rate of telemedicine visits among rural patients significantly increased to 147 visits per 1000 patients in June 2020. A similar but steeper increase (P=.15) was observed among urban patients (220 visits per 1000 urban patients). Telemedicine use increased across all age groups, with the highest rates reported among older adults aged ≥65 years (77 visits per 100 patients in 2020). The proportions of patients with at least 1 telemedicine visit were similar across the adult age groups (n=82,246/290,401, 28.3% for patients aged 18-49 years, n=79,339/290,401, 27.3% for patients aged 50-64 years, and n=80,833/290,401, 27.8% for patients aged 65-79 years), but lower among younger patients <18 years (n=23,699/290,401, 8.2%) and older patients ≥80 years (n=24,284/290,401, 8.4%) in 2020 (P<.001). There were more female users than male users of telemedicine (n=158,643/290,401, 54.6% vs n=131,758/290,401, 45.4%, respectively, in 2020; P<.001). There was a significantly higher proportion of telemedicine users residing in relatively less rural than in more rural regions (n=261,814/290,401, 90.2% vs n=28,587/290,401, 9.8%, respectively, in 2020; P<.001). Conclusions: Telemedicine adoption increased in rural and remote areas during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its use increased in urban and less rural populations. Future studies should investigate the potential barriers to telemedicine use among rural patients and the impact of rural telemedicine on patient health care utilization and outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/26960

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, video telehealth was generally used less frequently among older adults, rural residents, and racial and ethnic minority patients.

    “Notably, during the COVID-19 pandemic, video telehealth was generally used less frequently among older adults, rural residents, and racial and ethnic minority patients.50,51”

    From Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Results report lower overall telemedicine use among rural than urban patients during the pandemic (147 versus 220 visits per 1,000 patients in June 2020). But the Discussion’s Limitations state that the data do not distinguish video from telephone visits. The Discussion also reports the highest overall telemedicine-use rates among older adults, and the cited passages do not address racial or ethnic minority patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, C., Cram, P., Pang, A., Stamenova, V., Tadrous, M., & Bhatia, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Women's College Hospital (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bhatia, R Sacha
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-04-05
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
e26960
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139107611
Cited by
183
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 16
FWCI
30.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG058878)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
telemedicine use, COVID-19 pandemic, rural health, remote care, telehealth adoption, urban-rural differences, Ontario, health care utilization trends, older adults, health care costs, health care access
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Rural Population, Telemedicine, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review