Cited by 45Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMachine Learning in HealthcareTopic Modeling

A question-and-answer system to extract data from free-text oncological pathology reports (CancerBERT Network): development study

Open access
Mitchell, Joseph Ross, Szepietowski, Phillip, Howard, Rachel, Reisman, Phillip, Jones, Jennie D, Lewis, Patricia, Fridley, Brooke L, Rollison, Dana E·2022·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information in pathology reports is critical for cancer care. Natural language processing (NLP) systems used to extract information from pathology reports are often narrow in scope or require extensive tuning. Consequently, there is growing interest in automated deep learning approaches. A powerful new NLP algorithm, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), was published in late 2018. BERT set new performance standards on tasks as diverse as question answering, named entity recognition, speech recognition, and more. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop a BERT-based system to automatically extract detailed tumor site and histology information from free-text oncological pathology reports. METHODS: We pursued three specific aims: extract accurate tumor site and histology descriptions from free-text pathology reports, accommodate the diverse terminology used to indicate the same pathology, and provide accurate standardized tumor site and histology codes for use by downstream applications. We first trained a base language model to comprehend the technical language in pathology reports. This involved unsupervised learning on a training corpus of 275,605 electronic pathology reports from 164,531 unique patients that included 121 million words. Next, we trained a question-and-answer (Q&A) model that connects a Q&A layer to the base pathology language model to answer pathology questions. Our Q&A system was designed to search for the answers to two predefined questions in each pathology report: What organ contains the tumor? and What is the kind of tumor or carcinoma? This involved supervised training on 8197 pathology reports, each with ground truth answers to these 2 questions determined by certified tumor registrars. The data set included 214 tumor sites and 193 histologies. The tumor site and histology phrases extracted by the Q&A model were used to predict International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3), site and histology codes. This involved fine-tuning two additional BERT models: one to predict site codes and another to predict histology codes. Our final system includes a network of 3 BERT-based models. We call this CancerBERT network (caBERTnet). We evaluated caBERTnet using a sequestered test data set of 2050 pathology reports with ground truth answers determined by certified tumor registrars. RESULTS: caBERTnet's accuracies for predicting group-level site and histology codes were 93.53% (1895/2026) and 97.6% (1993/2042), respectively. The top 5 accuracies for predicting fine-grained ICD-O-3 site and histology codes with 5 or more samples each in the training data set were 92.95% (1794/1930) and 96.01% (1853/1930), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an NLP system that outperforms existing algorithms at predicting ICD-O-3 codes across an extensive range of tumor sites and histologies. Our new system could help reduce treatment delays, increase enrollment in clinical trials of new therapies, and improve patient outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/27210

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [17]Nguyen M Structured pathology reporting for cancer from free text: lung cancer case study Electron J Health Informatics 2012 7 1 10.1109/TELSKS.2001.955803.S.Datta,etal.Journal · DOI
  2. [23]Devlin J Chang M Lee K Toutanova K BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019 2019 Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019 Jun 2 - 7, 2019 Minneapolis, Minnesota
  3. [28]Yang Z Dai Z Yang Y Carbonell J Salakhutdinov R Le Q XLNet: generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding ArXiv. Preprint posted online January 2, 2020.
  4. [29]Lan Z Chen M Goodman S Gimpel K Sharma P Soricut R ALBERT: a Lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations ArXiv. Preprint posted online February 9, 2020.
  5. [30]Liu Y Ott M Goyal N Du J Joshi M Chen D RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach ArXiv. Preprint posted online July 26, 2019.
  6. [31]Sanh V Debut L Chaumond J Wolf T DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter ArXiv. Preprint posted online March 1, 2020.
  7. [33]Raffel C Shazeer N Roberts A Lee K Narang S Matena M Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer ArXiv. Preprint posted online July 28, 2020.
  8. [34]Ju Y Zhao F Chen S Zheng B Yang X Liu Y Technical report on conversational question answering ArXiv Preprint posted online Septmber 29, 2019.
  9. [38]Huang K Altosaar J Ranganath R ClinicalBERT: modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission ArXiv. Preprint posted online November 29, 2020.
  10. [45]Ma R Chen P Li G Weng W Lin A Gadepalli K Human-centric metric for accelerating pathology reports annotation ArXiv. Preprint posted online November 12, 2019.
  11. [47]Paszke A Gross S Massa F Lerer A Bradbury J Chanan G Killeen T Lin Z Gimelshein N Antiga L Desmaison A Köpf A Yang E DeVito Z Raison M Tejani A Chilamkurthy S Steiner B Fang L Bai J Chintala S PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019 Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Dec 8-14, 2019 Vancouver, Canada 10.5555/3454287.3455008 · DOI
  12. [49]Jain A Meenachi N Venkatraman B NukeBERT: a pre-trained language model for low resource nuclear domain ArXiv. Preprint posted online August 19, 2020.
  13. [51]Vaswani A Shazeer N Parmar N Uszkoreit J Jones L Gomez A Attention is all you need Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Dec 4 - 9, 2017 Long Beach, CA, USA
  14. [53]Zhang Z Sabuncu M Generalized cross entropy loss for training deep neural networks with noisy labels Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018 Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Dec 3 - 8, 2018 Montréal Canada 10.5555/3327546.3327555 PMC11747755 39839708 · DOI
  15. [74]Settles B From theories to queries: active learning in practice JMLR Workshop Conference Proc 2011 16 1 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, J. R., Szepietowski, P., Howard, R., Reisman, P., Jones, J. D., Lewis, P., Fridley, B. L., & Rollison, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rollison, Dana E
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
e27210
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211439143
Cited by
45
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
question answering, BERT, natural language processing, named entity recognition, fine-tuning, unsupervised pre-training, clinical text mining, electronic health records, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Language, Medical Oncology, Natural Language Processing, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review