Acceptability and Potential Impact of the #chatsafe Suicide Postvention Response Among Young People Who Have Been Exposed to Suicide: Pilot Study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Young people are more likely to be affected by suicide contagion, and there are concerns about the role social media plays in the development and maintenance of suicide clusters or in facilitating imitative suicidal behavior. However, social media also presents an opportunity to provide real-time and age-appropriate suicide prevention information, which could be an important component of suicide postvention activities. Objective: This study aimed to test an intervention designed to equip young people to communicate safely online about suicide (#chatsafe) with a sample of young people who had recently been exposed to a suicide or suicide attempt, with a view to determining the role social media can play as part of a postvention response. Methods: A sample of 266 young people from Australia, aged 16 to 25 years, were recruited to participate in the study. They were eligible if they had been exposed to a suicide or knew of a suicide attempt in the past 2 years. All participants received the #chatsafe intervention, which comprised 6 pieces of social media content that were sent to them weekly via direct message through Instagram, Facebook, or Snapchat. Participants were assessed on a range of outcome measures (social media use, willingness to intervene against suicide, internet self-efficacy, confidence, and safety when communicating about suicide on social media platforms) at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 4-week follow-up. Results: After the 6-week #chatsafe intervention, participants reported substantial improvements in their willingness to intervene against suicide online, their internet self-efficacy, and their perceived confidence and safety when communicating about suicide online. Overall, the participants reported that it was appropriate to receive the #chatsafe intervention via social media, and no iatrogenic effects were recorded. Conclusions: The findings suggest that it is safe and acceptable to disseminate suicide prevention information entirely via social media among young people who have recently been exposed to a suicide or suicide attempt. Interventions such as #chatsafe could potentially mitigate the risk of distress and future suicidal behavior in young people by improving the quality and safety of online communication about suicide and, as such, can be an important component of delivering a postvention response to young people.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Therapeutic platforms can be used to reduce the risk of suicide and self-harm, depression, and alcohol misuse.
“These platforms can also be used to reduce the risk of suicide and self-harm, 354,355 depression, and alcohol misuse.”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [354]
The Discussion (Implications; page unavailable) says #chatsafe may act as a protective factor for young people after a suicide, supporting the possibility of reduced suicide risk. The Methods (Study Outcomes and Measures; page unavailable) show that the pilot measured willingness to intervene and online communication, not suicide or self-harm outcomes. The citation is attached to suicide and self-harm, not the later claims about depression and alcohol misuse; our copy does not support the self-harm component. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548 · see citing works
Naghavi, M. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l94 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Mokdad, A. H., Forouzanfar, M. H., Daoud, F., Mokdad, A. A., El Bcheraoui, C., Moradi-Lakeh, M., Kyu, H. H., Barber, R. M., Wagner, J., Cercy, K., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00648-6 · Cited by 984 · see citing works
Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents
Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Kellerman, J., Pollak, O., Cha, C. B., Esposito, E. C., Porter, A. C., Wyman, P. A., & Boatman, A. E. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13106 · Cited by 391 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although overall suicide rates have been decreasing in recent decades [3], this is not the case for young people for whom suicide rates have steadily increased in many parts of the world [4].”
BackgroundWhat Works in Youth Suicide Prevention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Robinson, J., Bailey, E., Witt, K., Stefanac, N., Milner, A., Currier, D., Pirkis, J., Condron, P., & Hetrick, S. (2018) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Self-citationSuicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among LGBTQ Youth: Meta-Analyses and a Systematic Review
Hatchel, T., Polanin, J. R., & Espelage, D. L. (2021) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2019.1663329 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Clustering of suicides in children and adolescents
Hawton, K., Hill, N. T. M., Gould, M., John, A., Lascelles, K., & Robinson, J. (2020) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30335-9 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationHammond, G. C., Croudace, T. J., Radhakrishnan, M., Lafortune, L., Watson, A., McMillan-Shields, F., & Jones, P. B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042916 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
An adolescent suicide cluster and the possible role of electronic communication technology
Robertson, L., Skegg, K., Poore, M., Williams, S., & Taylor, B. (2012) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000140 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is unsurprising, given the amount of time young people typically spend online and the speed at which unregulated and potentially distressing information about suicide can spread [17,18].”
BackgroundThe mental health and social media use of young Australians during the COVID-19 pandemic
Bailey, E., Boland, A., Bell, I., Nicholas, J., La Sala, L., & Robinson, J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031077 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- [5]Robinson J Too LS Pirkis J Spittal MJ Spatial suicide clusters in Australia between 2010 and 2012: a comparison of cluster and non-cluster among young people and adults BMC Psychiatry 2016 11 22 16 1 417 10.1186/s12888-016-1127-8 27876026 10.1186/s12888-016-1127-8 27876026 PMC5120558 · DOI
- [6]Gould MS Wallenstein S Kleinman M Time-space clustering of teenage suicide Am J Epidemiol 1990 01 131 1 71 8 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115487 2293755 2293755 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Robinson J Pirkis J O'Connor RC O'Connor RC Pirkis J Suicide clusters The International Handbook of Suicide Prevention. 2nd edition 2016 09 Hoboken, NJ, USA Wiley-Blackwell 758 74
- [8]Joiner Jr TE Contagion of suicidal symptoms as a function of assortative relating and shared relationship stress in college roommates J Adolesc 2003 08 26 4 495 504 10.1016/s0140-1971(02)00133-1 12887937 S0140197102001331 12887937 · DOI
- [10]Beautrais AL Risk factors for suicide and attempted suicide among young people Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000 06 34 3 420 36 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00691.x 10881966 10881966 · DOI
- [12]Johansson L Lindqvist P Eriksson A Teenage suicide cluster formation and contagion: implications for primary care BMC Fam Pract 2006 05 17 7 32 10.1186/1471-2296-7-32 16707009 1471-2296-7-32 16707009 PMC1488851 · DOI
- [13]Hill NT Witt K Rajaram G McGorry PD Robinson J Suicide by young Australians, 2006-2015: a cross-sectional analysis of national coronial data Med J Aust 2021 02 214 3 133 9 10.5694/mja2.50876 33236400 33236400 · DOI
- [14]Hill NT Robinson J Pirkis J Andriessen K Krysinska K Payne A Boland A Clarke A Milner A Witt K Krohn S Lampit A Association of suicidal behavior with exposure to suicide and suicide attempt: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis PLoS Med 2020 03 31 17 3 e1003074 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003074 32231381 PMEDICINE-D-19-02935 32231381 PMC7108695 · DOI
- [15]Pirkis JE Burgess PM Francis C Blood RW Jolley DJ The relationship between media reporting of suicide and actual suicide in Australia Soc Sci Med 2006 06 62 11 2874 86 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.033 16387400 S0277-9536(05)00630-1 16387400 · DOI
- [16]Brownlie J Ho JC Dunne N Fernández N Squirrell T Troubling content: guiding discussion of death by suicide on social media Sociol Health Illn 2021 03 43 3 607 23 10.1111/1467-9566.13245 33635572 33635572 · DOI
- [17]Silenzio VM Duberstein PR Tang W Lu N Tu X Homan CM Connecting the invisible dots: reaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents and young adults at risk for suicide through online social networks Soc Sci Med 2009 08 69 3 469 74 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.029 19540641 S0277-9536(09)00325-6 19540641 PMC2768574 · DOI
- [19]Arendt F Scherr S Romer D Effects of exposure to self-harm on social media: evidence from a two-wave panel study among young adults New Media Soc 2019 11 01 21 11-12 2422 42 10.1177/1461444819850106 · DOI
- [20]La Sala L Teh Z Lamblin M Rajaram G Rice S Hill NT Thorn P Krysinska K Robinson J Can a social media intervention improve online communication about suicide? A feasibility study examining the acceptability and potential impact of the #chatsafe campaign PLoS One 2021 06 15 16 6 e0253278 10.1371/journal.pone.0253278 34129610 PONE-D-20-36528 34129610 PMC8205132 · DOI
- [22]Dunlop SM More E Romer D Where do youth learn about suicides on the internet, and what influence does this have on suicidal ideation? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2011 10 52 10 1073 80 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02416.x 21658185 21658185 · DOI
- [23]Carlyle KE Guidry JP Williams K Tabaac A Perrin PB Suicide conversations on Instagram™: contagion or caring? J Commun Healthc 2018 01 02 11 1 12 8 10.1080/17538068.2018.1436500 · DOI
- [24]Lavis A Winter R #Online harms or benefits? An ethnographic analysis of the positives and negatives of peer-support around self-harm on social media J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020 08 61 8 842 54 10.1111/jcpp.13245 32459004 32459004 · DOI · Paper page
- [25]Krysinska K Andriessen K Online memorialization and grief after suicide: an analysis of suicide memorials on the internet Omega (Westport) 2015 71 1 19 47 10.1177/0030222814568276 26152025 26152025 · DOI
- [26]Robinson J Hill NT Thorn P Battersby R Teh Z Reavley NJ Pirkis J Lamblin M Rice S Skehan J The #chatsafe project. Developing guidelines to help young people communicate safely about suicide on social media: a Delphi study PLoS One 2018 11 15 13 11 e0206584 10.1371/journal.pone.0206584 30439958 PONE-D-18-26437 30439958 PMC6237326 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Thorn P Hill NT Lamblin M Teh Z Battersby-Coulter R Rice S Bendall S Gibson KL Finlay SM Blandon R de Souza L West A Cooksey A Sciglitano J Goodrich S Robinson J Developing a suicide prevention social media campaign with young people (the #Chatsafe Project): co-design approach JMIR Ment Health 2020 05 11 7 5 e17520 10.2196/17520 32391800 v7i5e17520 32391800 PMC7248803 · DOI
- [28]Cox GR Bailey E Jorm AF Reavley NJ Templer K Parker A Rickwood D Bhar S Robinson J Development of suicide postvention guidelines for secondary schools: a Delphi study BMC Public Health 2016 02 24 16 180 10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6 26912256 10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6 26912256 PMC4765027 · DOI
- [34]Hill NT Spittal MJ Pirkis J Torok M Robinson J Risk factors associated with suicide clusters in Australian youth: identifying who is at risk and the mechanisms associated with cluster membership EClinicalMedicine 2020 11 20 29-30 100631 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100631 33294825 S2589-5370(20)30375-8 33294825 PMC7691728 · DOI
- [35]Robinson J Teh Z Lamblin M Hill NT La Sala L Thorn P Globalization of the #chatsafe guidelines: using social media for youth suicide prevention Early Interv Psychiatry 2021 10 15 5 1409 13 10.1111/eip.13044 32935440 32935440 · DOI
- [38]Aldrich RS Harrington NG Cerel J The willingness to intervene against suicide questionnaire Death Stud 2014 01 38 1-5 100 8 10.1080/07481187.2012.738763 24517708 24517708 · DOI
- [39]Kim Y Glassman M Beyond search and communication: development and validation of the Internet Self-efficacy Scale (ISS) Comput Hum Behav 2013 7 29 4 1421 9 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
- [40]Wisniewski PJ Xu H Rosson MB Perkins DF Carroll JM Dear diary: teens reflect on their weekly online risk experiences Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016 CHI '16 May 7-12, 2016 San Jose, CA, USA 3919 30 10.1145/2858036.2858317 · DOI
- [42]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition 1988 Hillsdale, NJ, USA Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- [44]Fletcher S Chondros P Densley K Murray E Dowrick C Coe A Hegarty K Davidson S Wachtler C Mihalopoulos C Lee YY Chatterton ML Palmer VJ Gunn J Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial Br J Gen Pract 2021 01 28 71 703 e85 94 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0783 33431380 33431380 PMC7846356 · DOI
- [47]Marchant A Brown M Scourfield J Hawton K Cleobury L Dennis M Lloyd K McGregor J John A A content analysis and comparison of two peaks of newspaper reporting during a suicide cluster to examine implications for imitation, suggestion, and prevention Crisis 2020 09 41 5 398 406 10.1027/0227-5910/a000655 32141331 32141331 · DOI
- [48]Robinson J Cox G Bailey E Hetrick S Rodrigues M Fisher S Herrman H Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review Early Interv Psychiatry 2016 04 10 2 103 21 10.1111/eip.12229 25702826 25702826 · DOI · Paper page
- [49]Torok M Calear A Shand F Christensen H A systematic review of mass media campaigns for suicide prevention: understanding their efficacy and the mechanisms needed for successful behavioral and literacy change Suicide Life Threat Behav 2017 12 47 6 672 87 10.1111/sltb.12324 28044354 28044354 · DOI
- [51]Muñoz RF Bunge EL Chen K Schueller SM Bravin JI Shaughnessy EA Pérez-Stable EJ Massive open online interventions: a novel model for delivering behavioral-health services worldwide Clin Psychol Sci 2016 03 4 2 194 205 10.1177/2167702615583840 · DOI
- [52]Young AF Powers JR Bell SL Attrition in longitudinal studies: who do you lose? Aust N Z J Public Health 2006 08 30 4 353 61 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00849.x 16956166 16956166 · DOI
- [53]Hill NT Robinson J Responding to suicide clusters in the community: what do existing suicide cluster response frameworks recommend and how are they implemented? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 04 07 19 8 4444 10.3390/ijerph19084444 35457313 ijerph19084444 35457313 PMC9031396 · DOI
- [56]Aldrich RS Using the theory of planned behavior to predict college students' intention to intervene with a suicidal individual Crisis 2015 36 5 332 7 10.1027/0227-5910/a000330 26502783 26502783 · DOI
- [57]Ross AM Krysinska K Rickwood D Pirkis J Andriessen K How best to provide help to bereaved adolescents: a Delphi consensus study BMC Psychiatry 2021 11 23 21 1 591 10.1186/s12888-021-03591-7 34814884 10.1186/s12888-021-03591-7 34814884 PMC8609510 · DOI
- [58]Muehlenkamp JJ Hagan CR Factors predicting intent to intervene with a potentially suicidal peer Arch Suicide Res 2020 10 24 4 483 97 10.1080/13811118.2019.1635933 31248346 31248346 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health
McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Dalal, N., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Blakemore, S.-J., Browne, V., Dooley, B., Hickie, I. B., Jones, P. B., McDaid, D., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00163-9 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- La Sala, L., Pirkis, J., Cooper, C., Hill, N. T. M., Lamblin, M., Rajaram, G., Rice, S., Teh, Z., Thorn, P., Zahan, R., & Robinson, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Human Factors
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2023-05-19
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- e44535
- ISSN
- 2292-9495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10238962
- OpenAlex
- W4377093084
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Human Factors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- University of Melbourne
- Suicide Prevention Australia
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (2008460, 1173126, GNT1158881)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- suicide postvention, suicide contagion, youth, social media, internet self-efficacy, willingness to intervene, suicide prevention, suicide attempts, iatrogenic disease, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review