Cited by 25Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsMental Health via Writing

Prediction of diagnosis and treatment response in adolescents with depression by using a smartphone app and deep learning approaches: usability study

Open access
Kim, Jae Sung, Wang, Bohyun, Kim, Meelim, Lee, Jung, Kim, Hyungjun, Roh, Danyeul, Lee, Kyung Hwa, Hong, Soon-Beom +3 more·2023·JMIR Formative Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of quantifiable biomarkers is a major obstacle in diagnosing and treating depression. In adolescents, increasing suicidality during antidepressant treatment further complicates the problem. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate digital biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment response of depression in adolescents through a newly developed smartphone app. METHODS: We developed the Smart Healthcare System for Teens At Risk for Depression and Suicide app for Android-based smartphones. This app passively collected data reflecting the social and behavioral activities of adolescents, such as their smartphone usage time, physical movement distance, and the number of phone calls and text messages during the study period. Our study consisted of 24 adolescents (mean age 15.4 [SD 1.4] years, 17 girls) with major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosed with Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version and 10 healthy controls (mean age 13.8 [SD 0.6] years, 5 girls). After 1 week's baseline data collection, adolescents with MDD were treated with escitalopram in an 8-week, open-label trial. Participants were monitored for 5 weeks, including the baseline data collection period. Their psychiatric status was measured every week. Depression severity was measured using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale was administered in order to assess suicide severity. We applied the deep learning approach for the analysis of the data. Deep neural network was employed for diagnosis classification, and neural network with weighted fuzzy membership functions was used for feature selection. RESULTS: We could predict the diagnosis of depression with training accuracy of 96.3% and 3-fold validation accuracy of 77%. Of the 24 adolescents with MDD, 10 responded to antidepressant treatments. We predicted the treatment response of adolescents with MDD with training accuracy of 94.2% and 3-fold validation accuracy of 76%. Adolescents with MDD tended to move longer distances and use smartphones for longer periods of time compared to controls. The deep learning analysis showed that smartphone usage time was the most important feature in distinguishing adolescents with MDD from controls. Prominent differences were not observed in the pattern of each feature between the treatment responders and nonresponders. The deep learning analysis revealed that the total length of calls received as the most important feature predicting antidepressant response in adolescents with MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Our smartphone app demonstrated preliminary evidence of predicting diagnosis and treatment response in depressed adolescents. This is the first study to predict the treatment response of adolescents with MDD by examining smartphone-based objective data with deep learning approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/45991

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [50]Karsoliya S Approximating number of hidden layer neurons in multiple hidden layer BPNN architecture International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 2012 2023-04-27 http://www.ijettjournal.org/volume-3/issue-6/IJETT-V3I6P206.pdf

Authors
Kim, J. S., Wang, B., Kim, M., Lee, J., Kim, H., Roh, D., Lee, K. H., Hong, S.-B., Lim, J. S., Kim, J.-W., & Ryan, N.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jae-Won
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2023-05-24
Volume
7
Pages
e45991
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366316250
Cited by
25
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, digital biomarkers, mobile application, passive data collection, smartphone usage time, antidepressant response, escitalopram, suicide risk, depression diagnosis, deep learning, physical activity, wearable sensors, wearable heart rate monitor, wearable sleep trackers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review