Cited by 32Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDermatology and Skin DiseasesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Assessing the Accuracy and Comprehensiveness of ChatGPT in Offering Clinical Guidance for Atopic Dermatitis and Acne Vulgaris

Open access
Lakdawala, Nehal, Channa, Leelakrishna, Gronbeck, Christian, Lakdawala, Nikita, Weston, Gillian, Sloan, Brett, Feng, Hao·2023·JMIR Dermatology

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/50409

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLM responses to common questions around AD were overall mostly acceptable but otherwise incomplete or deviated from evidence-based medicine.

    “Two studies assessed LLM responses to common questions around AD, overall finding answers to be mostly acceptable but otherwise incomplete or deviated from evidence-based medicine (Lakdawala et al, 2023;Sulejmani et al, 2024).”

    From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Lakdawala et al, 2023

  • ChatGPT's responses to patient questions around acne had lower accuracy for acne treatment responses.

    “Lakdawala et al (2023) investigated ChatGPT’s responses to patient questions around acne, identifying lower accuracy responses concerning acne treatment.”

    From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Lakdawala et al, 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakdawala, N., Channa, L., Gronbeck, C., Lakdawala, N., Weston, G., Sloan, B., & Feng, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Feng, Hao
Venue
JMIR Dermatology
Published
2023-11-14
Volume
6
Pages
e50409
ISSN
2562-0959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388014955
Cited by
32
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, atopic dermatitis, acne, clinical guidance, AI accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review