The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of the Pasifika Women’s Diabetes Wellness Program (PWDWP): Protocol for a Pilot Intervention and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes poses public health challenges for Māori and Pasifika communities in Australia. The women of these communities face a greater burden from type 2 diabetes–related mortality and comorbidities. Lifestyle modification behaviors through previous women’s wellness programs have been shown to reduce the risk of developing complications in established type 2 diabetes. The Pasifika Women’s Diabetes Wellness Program (PWDWP) pilot study, co-designed with Māori and Pasifika communities, was aimed at addressing late hospital presentations from diabetes-related complications. Objective: This study (1) examines the efficacy of women with type 2 diabetes in the intervention group for improved glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) clinical levels and diabetes self-management compared with the control group from baseline (T0) to week 12 (T1) and week 24 (T2; postintervention) and (2) assesses the cultural adaptability, acceptability, and feasibility of the pilot intervention for future studies. Methods: This study uses a quasiexperimental design that involves a 24-week intervention. We recruited 50 Māori and Pasifika women with type 2 diabetes (25 in the intervention group from the south side of Brisbane and 25 in the control group from the north side of Brisbane) using participatory talanoa methodologies. The intervention group participated in face-to-face and virtual whānau education workshops (5 weeks) and had access to individual coaching and virtual support delivered by trained Māori and Pasifika health professionals and community health workers. The control group received usual care with their identified health provider. Both groups received copies of the PWDWP journal, fact sheets, and a health check passbook with tailored motivational text messages. An advisory committee was set up to oversee the program implementation, including protocols of engagement, health checks, and data collection in community settings. The quantitative data were collected at T0, T1, and T2 with HbA1c as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes measured changes in diabetes self-care and body composition (eg, BMI, waist circumference). Qualitative data will ascertain the program’s feasibility and cultural adaptability using talanoa focus groups. Results: This pilot study was approved by the Queensland University of Technology Human Ethic Research Committee (5609) and began in January 2023 after participant recruitment between July 2022 and December 2022. The final data collection including the health check, focus group, and survey data was completed in November 2023, and data analysis and reporting are expected to conclude in 2024. Conclusions: This study provides a blueprint for PWDWP. Collaborative partnerships with community organizations and stakeholders are crucial for program success and suggest a potential model for targeting diabetes management for Māori and Pasifika communities, emphasizing the need for culturally relevant interventions. The findings will have significant implications for policymakers and practitioners when developing and implementing public health initiatives, particularly for communities with unique cultural nuances. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622001100785p; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384470&isReview=true International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55435
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social determinants of health and diabetes: A scientific review
Hill-Briggs, F., Adler, N. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Navas-Acien, A., Thornton, P. L., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0053 · Cited by 1,732
Talanoa Research Methodology: A Developing Position on Pacific Research
Vaioleti, T. M. (2016) · Waikato Journal of Education · doi:10.15663/wje.v12i1.296 · Cited by 756
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- International Diabetes FederationIDF Diabetes Atlas 2021International Diabetes Federation20212023-07-03https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11606-009-1241-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcte.2016.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12889-017-4807-5 · DOI
- 10.2174/1573399813666170621123227 · DOI
- 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30111-7 · DOI
- Colagiuri, S, 2017, Diabetes Mellitus in Developing Countries and Underserved Communities, 151, 10.1007/978-3-319-41559-8_9 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12939-019-1110-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108654 · DOI
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.18798.05440? · DOI
- 10.1111/ijcp.13392 · DOI
- 10.1353/CPR.2022.0011 · DOI
- 10.1111/hsc.13580 · DOI
- 10.1177/11771801231196777 · DOI
- 10.1002/hpja.329 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0145721709335006 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0187139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1611179 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa1616035 · DOI
- 10.1177/0145721715624968 · DOI
- Pallant, J, 2013, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 5th edition
- 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108000 · DOI
- 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30412-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/1177083x.2021.1876743 · DOI
- 10.1002/hpja.438 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Akbar, H., Contor, M., Niumata, W., Anderson, D., & Gallegos, D.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Queensland Health (AU)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Akbar, Heena
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-03-11
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- e55435
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391293727
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Diabetes Australia
- Queensland University of Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, Māori women, culturally tailored interventions, community health workers, diabetes self-management, HbA1c, body composition, diabetes complications, co-design, talanoa, feasibility, cultural adaptability, Indigenous health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review