The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smartphone App Designed to Collect Health Information in Older Adults: Usability Study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Studies evaluating the usability of mobile-phone assessments in older adults are limited. Objective: This study aims to identify design-based barriers and facilitators to mobile app survey completion among 2 samples of older adults; those in the Framingham Heart Study and a more diverse sample from a hospital-based setting. Methods: We used mixed methods to identify challenging and beneficial features of the mobile app in participants from the electronic Framingham Heart Study (n=15; mean age of 72 years; 6/15, 40% women; 15/15, 100% non-Hispanic and White) and among participants recruited from a hospital-based setting (n=15; mean age of 71 years; 7/15, 47% women; 3/15, 20% Hispanic; and 8/15, 53% non-White). A variety of app-based measures with different response formats were tested, including self-reported surveys, pictorial assessments (to indicate body pain sites), and cognitive testing tasks (eg, Trail Making Test and Stroop). Participants completed each measure using a think-aloud protocol, while being audio- and video-recorded with a qualitative interview conducted at the end of the session. Recordings were coded for participant usability errors by 2 pairs of coders. Participants completed the Mobile App Rating Scale to assess the app (response range 1=inadequate to 5=excellent). Results: In electronic Framingham Heart Study participants, the average total Mobile App Rating Scale score was 7.6 (SD 1.1), with no significant differences in the hospital-based sample. In general, participants were pleased with the app and found it easy to use. A large minority had at least 1 navigational issue, most committed only once. Most older adults did not have difficulty completing the self-reported multiple-choice measures unless it included lengthy instructions but participants had usability issues with the Stroop and Trail Making Test. Conclusions: Our methods and results help guide app development and app-based survey construction for older adults, while also giving consideration to sociodemographic differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps
Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., & Mani, M. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3422 · Cited by 2,233
Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis
Gomez-Hernandez, M., Ferre, X., Moral, C., & Villalba-Mora, E. (2023) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/43186 · Cited by 161
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1111/jgs.18179 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/gny081 · DOI
- 10.1093/geroni/igy002 · DOI
- 10.2196/11569 · DOI
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-408138-3.00012-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/14551 · DOI
- 10.1136/jamia.2009.001362 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.020 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.5105 · DOI
- 10.2196/11451 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.7099 · DOI
- 10.2196/mhealth.7046 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph17113768 · DOI
- 10.1111/jgs.16403 · DOI
- 10.2147/PPA.S361032 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-7435(75)90037-7 · DOI
- BlairJConradFAckermannACClaxtonGThe effect of sample size on interview findingsAAPOR-American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods20052024-05-14http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000127.pdf
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pon.3522 · DOI
- 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000506 · DOI
- 10.3233/THC-161274 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/0361073X.2016.1191838 · DOI
- 10.2196/mhealth.6939 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geront/gnz163 · DOI
- 10.2196/humanfactors.7718 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306282 · DOI
- 10.1111/jgs.17551 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exger.2019.02.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00121-0 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00568 · DOI
- 10.2196/mhealth.5127 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.5507 · DOI
- 10.1093/geroni/igad029 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Murabito, J. M., Faro, J. M., Zhang, Y., DeMalia, A., Hamel, A., Agyapong, N., Liu, H., Schramm, E., McManus, D. D., & Borrelli, B.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- CareEvolution (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Murabito, Joanne M
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Human Factors
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-05-30
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- e56653
- ISSN
- 2292-9495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11176875
- OpenAlex
- W4399171778
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Human Factors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG076757)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92019D00031, N01-HC-025195, K01HL163254)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- mobile health apps, older adults, usability, Stroop task, Trail Making Test, sociodemographic differences, app navigation, Framingham Heart Study
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review