CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 449Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey

Open access
Kummervold, Per Egil, Chronaki, Catherine E, Lausen, Berthold, Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich, Rasmussen, Janne, Santana, Silvina, Staniszewski, Andrzej, Wangberg, Silje Camilla·2008·Journal of Medical Internet Research
DOI 10.2196/jmir.1023PMC PMC2629359
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the number of Internet users worldwide has dramatically increased. People are using the Internet for various health-related purposes. It is important to monitor such use as it may have an impact on the individual's health and behavior, patient-practitioner roles, and on general health care provision. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates trends and patterns of European health-related Internet use over a period of 18 months. The main study objective was to estimate the change in the proportion of the population using the Internet for health purposes, and the importance of the Internet as a source of health information compared to more traditional sources. METHODS: The survey data were collected through computer-assisted telephone interviews. A representative sample (N = 14,956) from seven European countries has been used: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Norway, Poland, and Portugal. The European eHealth Consumer Trends Survey was first conducted in October-November 2005 and repeated in April-May 2007. In addition to providing background information, respondents were asked to rate the importance of various sources of health information. They were also queried as to the frequency of different online activities related to health and illness and the effects of such use on their disposition. RESULTS: The percentage of the population that has used the Internet for health purposes increased from an estimated 42.3% (95% CI [Confidence Interval] 41.3 - 43.3) in 2005 to an estimated 52.2% (95% CI 51.3 - 53.2) in 2007. Significant growth in the use of the Internet for health purposes was found in all the seven countries. Young women are the most active Internet health users. The importance of the Internet as a source of health information has increased. In 2007, the Internet was perceived as an important source of health information by an estimated 46.8% (95% CI 45.7 - 47.9) of the population, a significant increase of 6.5 % (95% CI 4.9 - 8.1) from 2005. The importance of all the traditional health information channels has either decreased or remained the same. An estimated 22.7% (95% CI 21.7 - 23.6) are using it for more interactive services than just reading health information. CONCLUSION: The Internet is increasingly being used as a source of health information by the European population, and its perceived importance is rising. Use of the Internet for health purposes is growing in all age groups and for both men and women, with especially strong growth among young women. We see that experienced Internet health users are also using the Internet as an active communication channel, both for reaching health professionals and for communicating with peers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1023

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Internet and Internet health usage in 2005 and 2007, by age and gender (numbers are available in Multimedia Appendices 2 and 3)
Figure 1 Internet and Internet health usage in 2005 and 2007, by age and gender (numbers are available in Multimedia Appendices 2 and 3)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Eysenbach, G, 2003, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 225
  2. Bovi, AM, 2003, Am J Bioeth, 3, W-IF2
  3. Ball, Marion J, 2007, J Healthc Inf Manag, 21, 76
  4. Houston, Thomas K, 2004, Am J Manag Care, 10, 601
  5. Santana, S, 2006, Cunningham P, Cunningham M, editors. Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications and Case Studies. Volume 3, 1021
  6. Katz, Steven J, 2004, Am J Manag Care, 10, 593
  7. Sadan, B, 2002, Stud Health Technol Inform, 90, 514

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–449 of 449

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kummervold, P. E., Chronaki, C. E., Lausen, B., Prokosch, H.-U., Rasmussen, J., Santana, S., Staniszewski, A., & Wangberg, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • MedCom (DE)
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
Corresponding author
Kummervold, Per Egil
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Published
2008-11-17
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e42
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2196/jmir.1023
PMC
PMC2629359
OpenAlex
W2130026454
Cited by
449
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 42
FWCI
53.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
e-health, health-related internet use, online health information, health information sources, virtual care, patient-practitioner relationship, health behavior, young women, Europe, cross-national comparison, health care delivery, patient empowerment, health literacy, health promotion, health policy
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Automation, Computer Literacy, Data Collection, Europe, Health Education, Humans, Information Services, Interviews as Topic, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Internet, Electronic Mail, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review