Cited by 1,129Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results From a National Survey

Baker, Laurence, Wagner, Todd H., Singer, Sara, Bundorf, M. Kate·2003·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Internet has attracted considerable attention as a means to improve health and health care delivery, but it is not clear how prevalent Internet use for health care really is or what impact it has on health care utilization. Available estimates of use and impact vary widely. Without accurate estimates of use and effects, it is difficult to focus policy discussions or design appropriate policy activities. OBJECTIVES: To measure the extent of Internet use for health care among a representative sample of the US population, to examine the prevalence of e-mail use for health care, and to examine the effects that Internet and e-mail use has on users' knowledge about health care matters and their use of the health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey conducted in December 2001 and January 2002 among a sample drawn from a research panel of more than 60 000 US households developed and maintained by Knowledge Networks. Responses were analyzed from 4764 individuals aged 21 years or older who were self-reported Internet users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported rates in the past year of Internet and e-mail use to obtain information related to health, contact health care professionals, and obtain prescriptions; perceived effects of Internet and e-mail use on health care use. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of respondents with Internet access reported using the Internet to look for advice or information about health or health care in 2001. Six percent reported using e-mail to contact a physician or other health care professional. About one third of those using the Internet for health reported that using the Internet affected a decision about health or their health care, but very few reported impacts on measurable health care utilization; 94% said that Internet use had no effect on the number of physician visits they had and 93% said it had no effect on the number of telephone contacts. Five percent or less reported use of the Internet to obtain prescriptions or purchase pharmaceutical products. CONCLUSIONS: Although many people use the Internet for health information, use is not as common as is sometimes reported. Effects on actual health care utilization are also less substantial than some have claimed. Discussions of the role of the Internet in health care and the development of policies that might influence this role should not presume that use of the Internet for health information is universal or that the Internet strongly influences health care utilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, L., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S., & Bundorf, M. K.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-05-14
Volume
289
Issue
18
Pages
2400
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2039522453
Cited by
1,129
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 68
FWCI
128.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 17253, P30AG017253)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
internet use, email, health information seeking, health care utilization, online health care, physician contact, prescription access, health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Data Collection, Demography, Female, Health Education, Health Services, Humans, Information Services, Male, Middle Aged, Drug Prescriptions, Regression Analysis, United States, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review