The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlates of Health-Related Social Media Use Among Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Sixty percent of Internet users report using the Internet to look for health information. Social media sites are emerging as a potential source for online health information. However, little is known about how people use social media for such purposes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) to establish the frequency of various types of online health-seeking behaviors, and (2) to identify correlates of 2 health-related online activities, social networking sites (SNS) for health-related activities and consulting online user-generated content for answers about health care providers, health facilities, or medical treatment. METHODS: The study consisted of a telephone survey of 1745 adults who reported going online to look for health-related information. Four subscales were created to measure use of online resources for (1) using SNS for health-related activities; (2) consulting online rankings and reviews of doctors, hospitals or medical facilities, and drugs or medical treatments; (3) posting a review online of doctors, hospitals or medical facilities, and drugs or medical treatments, and (4) posting a comment or question about health or medical issues on various social media. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Respondents consulted online rankings or reviews (41.15%), used SNS for health (31.58%), posted reviews (9.9%1), and posted a comment, question, or information (15.19%). Respondents with a chronic disease were nearly twice as likely to consult online rankings (odds ratio [OR] 2.09, 95% CI 1.66-2.63, P<.001). Lower odds of consulting online reviews were associated with less formal education (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.65, P<.001) and being male (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.87, P<.001). Respondents with higher incomes were 1.5 times as likely to consult online rankings or reviews (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.10-2.24, P=.05), than respondents with a regular provider (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.52-2.78, P<.001), or living in an urban/suburban location (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.22, P<.001). Older respondents were less likely to use SNS for health-related activities (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.97, P<.001), as were males (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, P<.001), whereas respondents with a regular provider had nearly twice the likelihood of using SNS for health-related activities (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43-2.52, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: People are using social media for seeking health information. However, individuals are more likely to consume information than they are to contribute to the dialog. The inherent value of "social" in social media is not being captured with online health information seeking. People with a regular health care provider, chronic disease, and those in younger age groups are more likely to consult online rankings and reviews and use SNS for health-related activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 · Cited by 1,915
Social network use and personality
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018 · Cited by 979 · cited 1×
“For example, research on social network use has shown that personality traits, such as extroversion and neuroticism, are associated with social media use and sharing of information [28,29].”
Background
Cited by
Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W.-Y. S., & Prestin, A. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3117 · Cited by 917
Tennant, B., Stellefson, M., Dodd, V., Chaney, B., Chaney, D., Paige, S., & Alber, J. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3992 · Cited by 760
Hoare, E., Milton, K., Foster, C., & Allender, S. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0432-4 · Cited by 616
Viers, B. R., Lightner, D. J., Rivera, M. E., Tollefson, M. K., Boorjian, S. A., Karnes, R. J., Thompson, R. H., O’Neil, D. A., Hamilton, R. L., Gardner, M. R., et al. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002 · Cited by 252
A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients.
McAlpine, H., Joubert, L., Martin-Sanchez, F., Merolli, M., & Drummond, K. J. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.002 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2013-01-30
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e21
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030998171
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlates of Health-Related Social Media Use Among Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/jmir.2297
- The paper
- Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of Health-Related Social Media Use Among Adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.