The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Statistical shape models are widely used in biomedical research. They are routinely implemented for automatic image segmentation or object identification in medical images. In these fields, however, the acquisition of the large training datasets, required to develop these models, is usually a time-consuming process. Even after this effort, the collections of datasets are often lost or mishandled resulting in replication of work. OBJECTIVE: To solve these problems, the Virtual Skeleton Database (VSD) is proposed as a centralized storage system where the data necessary to build statistical shape models can be stored and shared. METHODS: The VSD provides an online repository system tailored to the needs of the medical research community. The processing of the most common image file types, a statistical shape model framework, and an ontology-based search provide the generic tools to store, exchange, and retrieve digital medical datasets. The hosted data are accessible to the community, and collaborative research catalyzes their productivity. RESULTS: To illustrate the need for an online repository for medical research, three exemplary projects of the VSD are presented: (1) an international collaboration to achieve improvement in cochlear surgery and implant optimization, (2) a population-based analysis of femoral fracture risk between genders, and (3) an online application developed for the evaluation and comparison of the segmentation of brain tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The VSD is a novel system for scientific collaboration for the medical image community with a data-centric concept and semantically driven search option for anatomical structures. The repository has been proven to be a useful tool for collaborative model building, as a resource for biomechanical population studies, or to enhance segmentation algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., Bayraktar, H. H., & Keaveny, T. M. (2003) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00071-x · Cited by 1,209 · cited 1×
“The bone intensity values were converted into material properties [32,33] and mapped onto each node of the FE (finite element) mesh of the second order tetrahedral elements.”
MethodA survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
Kalender, W. A., Felsenberg, D., Genant, H. K., Fischer, M., Dequeker, J., & Reeve, J. (1995) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/0720-048x(95)00631-y · Cited by 263
Cited by
The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)
Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2377694 · Cited by 6,781
Bakas, S., Akbari, H., Sotiras, A., Bilello, M., Rozycki, M., Kirby, J. S., Freymann, J. B., Farahani, K., & Davatzikos, C. (2017) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.117 · Cited by 3,049
Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images
Pereira, S., Pinto, A., Alves, V., & Silva, C. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2538465 · Cited by 2,735
Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Wang, R., Lei, T., Cui, R., Zhang, B., Meng, H., & Nandi, A. K. (2022) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419 · Cited by 892
Brain tumor detection and classification using machine learning: a comprehensive survey
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Haldorai, A., Yasmin, M., & Nayak, R. S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00563-y · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Kistler, M., Bonaretti, S., Pfahrer, M., Niklaus, R., & Büchler, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2013-11-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e245
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000269560
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/jmir.2930
- The paper
- Kistler, M., Bonaretti, S., Pfahrer, M., Niklaus, R., & Büchler, P. (2013). The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.