Activity Recognition for Persons With Stroke Using Mobile Phone Technology: Toward Improved Performance in a Home Setting
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Smartphones contain sensors that measure movement-related data, making them promising tools for monitoring physical activity after a stroke. Activity recognition (AR) systems are typically trained on movement data from healthy individuals collected in a laboratory setting. However, movement patterns change after a stroke (eg, gait impairment), and activities may be performed differently at home than in a lab. Thus, it is important to validate AR for gait-impaired stroke patients in a home setting for accurate clinical predictions. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to evaluate AR performance in a home setting for individuals who had suffered a stroke, by using different sets of training activities. Specifically, we compared AR performance for persons with stroke while varying the origin of training data, based on either population (healthy persons or persons with stoke) or environment (laboratory or home setting). METHODS: Thirty individuals with stroke and fifteen healthy subjects performed a series of mobility-related activities, either in a laboratory or at home, while wearing a smartphone. A custom-built app collected signals from the phone's accelerometer, gyroscope, and barometer sensors, and subjects self-labeled the mobility activities. We trained a random forest AR model using either healthy or stroke activity data. Primary measures of AR performance were (1) the mean recall of activities and (2) the misclassification of stationary and ambulatory activities. RESULTS: A classifier trained on stroke activity data performed better than one trained on healthy activity data, improving average recall from 53% to 75%. The healthy-trained classifier performance declined with gait impairment severity, more often misclassifying ambulatory activities as stationary ones. The classifier trained on in-lab activities had a lower average recall for at-home activities (56%) than for in-lab activities collected on a different day (77%). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke-based training data is needed for high quality AR among gait-impaired individuals with stroke. Additionally, AR systems for home and community monitoring would likely benefit from including at-home activities in the training data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Random Forest were less used than Support Vector Machines.
“RF were less used than the former [46,47,52,58]”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
A common issue in the included cohort studies was not recruiting able-bodied participants that age-match the stroke participants.
“Besides, a common issue we found on the included papers when doing cohort studies is not recruiting AB participants that age-match the SP recruited [47,57]”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers
Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918 · Cited by 2,912 · see citing works
Association of sedentary time with mortality independent of moderate to vigorous physical activity
Koster, A., Caserotti, P., Patel, K. V., Matthews, C. E., Berrigan, D., Van Domelen, D. R., Brychta, R. J., Chen, K. Y., & Harris, T. B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037696 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Tieges, Z., Mead, G., Allerhand, M., Duncan, F., van Wijck, F., Fitzsimons, C., Greig, C., & Chastin, S. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.015 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Capela, N. A., Lemaire, E. D., & Baddour, N. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124414 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data
Pavey, T. G., Gilson, N. D., Gomersall, S. R., Clark, B., & Trost, S. G. (2017) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.003 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
New Evidence for Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation
Dobkin, B. H., & Dorsch, A. (2013) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-013-0331-y · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Ellis, K., Godbole, S., Marshall, S., Lanckriet, G., Staudenmayer, J., & Kerr, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00036 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [1]Lord SE McPherson K McNaughton HK Rochester L Weatherall M Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 2 85 2 234 9 14966707 14966707
- [3]Michael KM Allen JK Macko RF Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 8 86 8 1552 6 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026 16084807 16084807 · DOI
- [6]Hamilton MT Healy GN Dunstan DW Zderic TW Owen N Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2008 7 2 4 292 8 10.1007/s12170-008-0054-8 22905272 22905272 PMC3419586 · DOI
- [7]Tremblay MS Colley RC Saunders TJ Healy GN Owen N Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010 12 35 6 725 40 10.1139/H10-079 21164543 21164543 · DOI
- [8]Dobkin BH Carmichael ST The specific requirements of neural repair trials for stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016 6 30 5 470 8 10.1177/1545968315604400 26359342 26359342 PMC4786476 · DOI
- [9]Dobkin BH Dorsch A The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011 25 9 788 98 10.1177/1545968311425908 21989632 21989632 PMC4098920 · DOI
- [10]Evans CC Hanke TA Zielke D Keller S Ruroede K Monitoring community mobility with global positioning system technology after a stroke: a case study J Neurol Phys Ther 2012 6 36 2 68 78 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318256511a 22592062 22592062 · DOI
- [11]Jayaraman A Deeny S Eisenberg Y Mathur G Kuiken T Global position sensing and step activity as outcome measures of community mobility and social interaction for an individual with a transfemoral amputation due to dysvascular disease Phys Ther 2014 3 94 3 401 10 10.2522/ptj.20120527 24092905 24092905 · DOI
- [12]Mahendran N Kuys SS Brauer SG Accelerometer and global positioning system measurement of recovery of community ambulation across the first 6 months after stroke: an exploratory prospective study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016 9 97 9 1465 72 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.013 27181183 27181183 · DOI
- [13]Fini NA Holland AE Keating J Simek J Bernhardt J How is physical activity monitored in people following stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2015 37 19 1717 31 10.3109/09638288.2014.978508 25374044 25374044 · DOI
- [15]Albert MV Toledo S Shapiro M Kording K Using mobile phones for activity recognition in Parkinson's patients Front Neurol 2012 3 158 10.3389/fneur.2012.00158 10.3389/fneur.2012.00158 23162528 23162528 PMC3491315 · DOI
- [16]Lonini L Gupta A Kording K Jayaraman A Activity recognition in patients with lower limb impairments: do we need training data from each patient? Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016 8 2016 3265 8 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591425 28269004 28269004 · DOI
- [17]Mizuike C Ohgi S Morita S Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer Gait Posture 2009 7 30 1 60 4 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.017 19349181 19349181 · DOI
- [18]Capela NA Lemaire ED Baddour N Rudolf M Goljar N Burger H Evaluation of a smartphone human activity recognition application with able-bodied and stroke participants J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016 1 20 13 5 10.1186/s12984-016-0114-0 26792670 26792670 PMC4719690 · DOI
- [19]Folstein Mf Folstein Se McHugh Pr “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975 11 12 3 189 98 1202204 1202204
- [20]Miller C Poellabauer C Configurable Integrated Monitoring System for Mobile Devices Procedia Computer Science 2014 4 Proc of the 11th International Conference on Mobile Systems and Pervasive Computing 2014 Niagara Falls, Canada 410 417 10.1002/iub.1366 · DOI
- [21]Hossain A Poellabauer C Challenges in building continuous smartphone sensing applications Proc of the 9th IEEE International Workshop on Selected Topics in WirelessMobile Computing 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications October 17-19, 2016 New York, NY
- [24]Seiffert C Khoshgoftaar TM Van Hulse J Napolitano A RUSBoost: a hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern A 2010 1 40 1 185 97 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2029559 · DOI
- [25]Albert MV Azeze Y Courtois M Jayaraman A In-lab versus at-home activity recognition in ambulatory subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017 2 06 14 1 10 10.1186/s12984-017-0222-5 28166824 28166824 PMC5294819 · DOI
- [26]von Schroeder HP Coutts RD Lyden PD Billings E Nickel VL Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment J Rehabil Res Dev 1995 2 32 1 25 31 7760264 7760264
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“Random Forrest (RF) and more specifically Random Trees (DT) were also massively employed [44,46,47,49,55,60,61,65,67,69].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
- Authors
- O'Brien, M. K., Shawen, N., Mummidisetty, C. K., Kaur, S., Bo, X., Poellabauer, C., Kording, K., & Jayaraman, A.
- Affiliations
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jayaraman, Arun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2017-05-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e184
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5465379
- OpenAlex
- W2619375121
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007418)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- activity recognition, stroke, gait disturbance, smartphone sensors, accelerometer, gyroscope, barometer, random forest
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Activities of Daily Living, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Stroke, Cell Phone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review