Cited by 8Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet: How Systematic was the Review?

Open access
Mayo-Wilson, Evan·2006·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

a systematic review".However, the article fails to cite several published (and indexed) trials of internet-delivered therapy (e.g.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e11

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies provide any cost data for Internet interventions.

    “However, while cost is an often cited reason for examining Internet interventions, few studies provide any cost data [3].”

    From The Science of Internet Interventions (2009) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayo-Wilson, E.
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e11
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998321959
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
online therapy, health interventions, systematic review methodology
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review