Cited by 11Online Learning and AnalyticsInnovations in Medical EducationBig Data and Business Intelligence

A Conceptual Analytics Model for an Outcome-Driven Quality Management Framework as Part of Professional Healthcare Education

Open access
Hervatis, Vasilis, Loe, Alan, Barman, Linda, O'Donoghue, John, Zary, Nabil·2015·JMIR Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preparing the future health care professional workforce in a changing world is a significant undertaking. Educators and other decision makers look to evidence-based knowledge to improve quality of education. Analytics, the use of data to generate insights and support decisions, have been applied successfully across numerous application domains. Health care professional education is one area where great potential is yet to be realized. Previous research of Academic and Learning analytics has mainly focused on technical issues. The focus of this study relates to its practical implementation in the setting of health care education. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to create a conceptual model for a deeper understanding of the synthesizing process, and transforming data into information to support educators' decision making. METHODS: A deductive case study approach was applied to develop the conceptual model. RESULTS: The analytics loop works both in theory and in practice. The conceptual model encompasses the underlying data, the quality indicators, and decision support for educators. CONCLUSIONS: The model illustrates how a theory can be applied to a traditional data-driven analytics approach, and alongside the context- or need-driven analytics approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mededu.4789

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001 Washington, D.C National Academy Press 25057539
  2. [3]Bleakley A Bligh J Browne J Medical Education for the Future Medical Education for the Future 2011 Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 252
  3. [8]Ferguson R The State of Learning Analytics in 2012: A Review and Future Challenges 2012 Milton Keynes Knowledge Media Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hervatis, V., Loe, A., Barman, L., O'Donoghue, J., & Zary, N.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hervatis, Vasilis
Venue
JMIR Medical Education
Published
2015-10-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
e11
ISSN
2369-3762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2190266637
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
data analytics, health professions education, quality management, conceptual model, data-driven analysis, quality indicators, decision support, educators, data to information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review