CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Survey Methodology and NonresponseTechnology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface Design

A Comparison of Tablet Computer and Paper-Based Questionnaires in Healthy Aging Research

Open access
Fanning, Jason, McAuley, Edward·2014·JMIR Research Protocols
DOI 10.2196/resprot.3291PMC PMC4129113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital questionnaire delivery offers many advantages to investigators and participants alike; however, evidence supporting digital questionnaire delivery via touchscreen device in the older adult population is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the use of tablet computer-delivered and printed questionnaires as vehicles for the collection of psychosocial data from older adults to determine whether this digital platform would be readily adopted by the sample, and to identify whether tablet delivery influences the content of data received. METHODS: The participants completed three questionnaires using both delivery methods, followed by a brief evaluation. RESULTS: A nonparametric one-sample binomial test indicated a significantly greater proportion of individuals preferred the tablet-delivered questionnaires (z=4.96, SE 3.428, P<.001). Paired sample t tests and Wilcoxon sign-rank tests indicated that measures collected by each method were not significantly different (all P≥.273). Ease of use of the tablet interface and anxiety while completing the digital questionnaires were significantly correlated with preferences, (rs=.665, P<.001 and rs=.552, P<.001, respectively). Participants most frequently reported that the tablet delivery increased speed of use and improved data entry, although navigation was perceived as being more difficult. By comparison, participants felt that the paper packet was easier to read and navigate, but was slow and cumbersome, and they disliked the lack of dynamic features. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that questionnaires delivered to older adults using contemporary tablet computers may be acceptable and do not substantively influence the content of the collected data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/resprot.3291

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]Crimmins EM Beltrán-Sánchez H Mortality and morbidity trends: Is there compression of morbidity? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2011 1 66 1 75 86 10.1093/geronb/gbq088 21135070 21135070 PMC3001754 · DOI
  2. [3]Greenlaw C Brown-Welty S A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: Testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost Eval Rev 2009 10 33 5 464 480 10.1177/0193841X09340214 19605623 19605623 · DOI
  3. [5]van Gelder MM Bretveld RW Roeleveld N Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010 12 1 172 11 1292 1298 10.1093/aje/kwq291 20880962 20880962 · DOI
  4. [7]Jayroe TJ Wolfram D Internet searching, tablet technology and older adults Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech 2013 1 24 Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012 USA Wiley 1 3 10.1002/meet.14504901236 · DOI
  5. [8]Findlater L Froehlich JE Fattal K Wobbrock JO Dastyar TD Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2013 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2013 Paris, France New York, NY, USA ACM 343 346 10.1145/2470654.2470703 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Hourcade JP Chrischilles E Gryzlak B Hanson BM Dunbar DE Eichmann DA Lorentzen RR Stephanidis C Design lessons for older adult personal health records software from older adults Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users Diversity: 6th International Conference, UAHCI 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011,... Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI) 2011 USA Springer
  7. [10]Hourcade JP Nguyen CM Perry KB Denburg NL Pointassist for older adults: Analyzing sub-movement characteristics to aid in pointing tasks Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2010 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2010 Atlanta, Georgia, USA New York, NY, USA ACM 1115 1124 10.1145/1753326.1753494 · DOI
  8. [11]Hwang F Hollinworth N Williams N ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2013 9 2014-07-10 Effects of target expansion on selection performance in older computer users http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2514848
  9. [12]Piper AM Campbell R Hollan JD Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2010 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI Conference 2010 Atlanta, GA, USA New York, New York, US ACM 907 916 10.1145/1753326.1753461 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [16]Grosinger J Vetere F Fitzpatrick G Agile life: Addressing knowledge and social motivations for active aging Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference 2012 The 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference November, 2012 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia New York, NY, USA ACM 162 165 10.1145/2414536.2414566 · DOI
  11. [17]Silveira P van de Langenberg R van Het Reve E Daniel F Casati F de Bruin ED Tablet-based strength-balance training to motivate and improve adherence to exercise in independently living older people: A phase II preclinical exploratory trial J Med Internet Res 2013 15 8 e159 10.2196/jmir.2579 23939401 23939401 PMC3742406 · DOI
  12. [18]Silveira P van het Reve E Daniel F Casati F de Bruin ED Motivating and assisting physical exercise in independently living older adults: A pilot study Int J Med Inform 2013 5 82 5 325 334 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.015 23273420 23273420 · DOI
  13. [19]Denscombe M Web-based questionnaires and the mode effect: An evaluation based on completion rates and data contents of near-identical questionnaires delivered in different modes Social Science Computer Review 2006 5 01 24 2 246 254 10.1177/0894439305284522 · DOI
  14. [20]Huang H Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? Computers in Human Behavior 2006 5 22 3 334 350 10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.012 · DOI
  15. [21]McCabe SE Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment J Drug Educ 2004 34 1 61 72 15468748 15468748
  16. [22]McCabe SE Boyd CJ Couper MP Crawford S D'Arcy H Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail J Stud Alcohol 2002 11 63 6 755 761 12529076 12529076
  17. [23]McAuley E The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults J Behav Med 1992 2 15 1 65 88 1583674 1583674
  18. [24]Washburn RA Smith KW Jette AM Janney CA The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Development and evaluation J Clin Epidemiol 1993 2 46 2 153 162 8437031 8437031
  19. [25]Buysse DJ Reynolds CF Monk TH Berman SR Kupfer DJ The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research Psychiatry Res 1989 5 28 2 193 213 2748771 2748771
  20. [26]de Jager CA Budge MM Clarke R Utility of TICS-M for the assessment of cognitive function in older adults Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003 4 18 4 318 324 10.1002/gps.830 12673608 12673608 · DOI
  21. [28]Gothe NP Mullen SP Wójcicki TR Mailey EL White SM Olson EA Szabo AN Kramer AF McAuley E Trajectories of change in self-esteem in older adults: Exercise intervention effects J Behav Med 2011 8 34 4 298 306 10.1007/s10865-010-9312-6 21222223 21222223 PMC3118401 · DOI
  22. [29]McAuley E Wójcicki TR Gothe NP Mailey EL Szabo AN Fanning J Olson EA Phillips SM Motl RW Mullen SP Effects of a DVD-delivered exercise intervention on physical function in older adults J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013 9 68 9 1076 1082 10.1093/gerona/glt014 23401566 23401566 PMC3738028 · DOI
  23. [32]Choi N Relationship between health service use and health information technology use among older adults: Analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey J Med Internet Res 2011 13 2 e33 10.2196/jmir.1753 21752784 21752784 PMC3221375 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanning, J., & McAuley, E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Fanning, Jason
ORCID
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Published
2014-07-16
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
e38
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2196/resprot.3291
PMC
PMC4129113
OpenAlex
W2031489478
Cited by
50
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
tablet computers, paper-based questionnaires, older adults, healthy aging, participant preferences, ease of use, touchscreen devices, data comparability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review