Cited by 163Land Rights and ReformsConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

LAND TENURE AND NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AGRARIAN COMMUNITIES IN ASIA AND AFRICA

Open access
Otsuka, Keijiro, Place, Frank, Otsuka, Keijiro, Place, Frank·2001·Unknown

Abstract

The devastating environmental effects of deforestation and the exploitation of other natural resources in the developing world have been well documented, yet their impact on local communities has received far less attention. This volume fills this gap by looking at how land degradation and deforestation are being addressed at the local level, where households have experienced the reduction of farm size and the decline of natural resources. Through a comparison of Asia and Africa, Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management examines the evolution of land tenure institutions within diverse cultural, natural, and policy environments. Specific topics include the evolution of customary land tenure, the impacts of land tenure policies, and common property management. The editors conclude that the best strategy for managing land and forest resources lies in promoting the establishment of property rights and investment in the improvement of the natural resource base. Topics Include: Issues and Theoretical Framework; Quantitative Methodology; Agroforestry Management in Ghana; Agroforestry Management in Sumatra; Tree and Cropland Management in Malawi; Customary and Private Land Management in Uganda; Management of State Land and Privatization in Vietnam; Common Property Forest Management in the Hill Region of Nepal; Timber Forest Management in Nepal and Japan Toward New Paradigms of Land and Tree Resource Management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.22004/ag.econ.16593

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otsuka, K., Place, F., Otsuka, K., & Place, F.
Venue
Unknown
Publisher
Unknown
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W1574836576
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land tenure, natural resource management, customary land tenure, land tenure policy, common property management, property rights, deforestation, land degradation, agroforestry, forest management, agrarian communities, Asia, Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review