Cited by 132Land Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Who Owns the Land? Perspectives from Rural Ugandans and Implications for Large-Scale Land Acquisitions

Doss, Cheryl, Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Bomuhangi, Allan·2014·Feminist Economics

Abstract

Rapidly growing demand for agricultural land is putting pressure on property-rights systems, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where customary tenure systems have provided secure land access. Rapid and large-scale demands from outsiders are challenging patterns of gradual, endogenous change toward formalization. Little attention has focused on the gender dimensions of this transformation. However this contribution, based on a 2008–09 study of land tenure in Uganda, analyzes how different definitions of land ownership – including household reports, existence of ownership documents, and rights over the land – provide very different indications of the gendered patterns of land ownership and rights. While many households report husbands and wives as joint owners of the land, women are less likely to be listed on ownership documents, and have fewer rights. A simplistic focus on “title” to land misses much of the reality regarding land tenure and could have an adverse impact on women's land rights.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13545701.2013.855320

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Customary laws favour property rights for land to be inherited by or given to men, creating a barrier for females to escape poverty through agribusiness and a push for females to engage in NFE.

    “Although Uganda's constitution provides equal rights to both genders, it is customary that laws favour property rights for land to be inherited by or given to men. This creates a barrier for females to escape poverty through agribusiness and a push for females to engage in NFE (Doss, Meinzen-Dick & Bomuhangi, 2014; Rietveld, Ajambo & Kikulwe, 2016; Rietveld et al., 202”

    From The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes (2021) · cites this paper as Doss, Meinzen-Dick & Bomuhangi, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Bomuhangi, A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
  • Makerere University (UG)
Corresponding author
Doss, Cheryl
Venue
Feminist Economics
Published
2013-12-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
76-100
ISSN
  • 1354-5701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4372
OpenAlex
W2039673801
Cited by
131
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Feminist Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
land tenure, women's land rights, land grabbing, customary land tenure, titles, rural Uganda, property rights, land formalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review